Effect of Keloid Properties on Treatment Efficacy, a Systematic Review

Author:

Bekkers Vazula1,Barsoum Paul2,Yin Qi2,Niessen Frank3,van Zuijlen Paul3456,Lapid Oren356,van Doorn Martijn1,Wolkerstorfer Albert2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Dermatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands;

2. Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (AUMC), Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;

3. Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, AUMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;

4. Burn Center and Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, The Netherlands;

5. Pediatric Surgical Center, Emma Children's Hospital, AUMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;

6. Amsterdam Movement Sciences Institute, AUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract

BACKGROUND The efficacy of keloid treatment in randomized studies is highly variable. However, no systematic review has been performed to evaluate the effect of different keloid properties on treatment efficacy. OBJECTIVE To identify clinically relevant keloid properties that may influence treatment efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS An electronic database search was conducted. Two reviewers independently selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and performed a methodologic quality assessment using the Cochrane risk-of-bias 2.0 tool. RESULTS One thousand five hundred twenty studies were screened, and 16 RCTs, involving 1,113 patients, were included. The authors found lower efficacy in older keloids (n = 3), keloids located on the chest, extremities, pinna, and shoulder (n = 3), larger keloids (n = 2), lower baseline Vancouver Scar Scale score (n = 1), and keloids with history of recurrence (n = 1). Overall, most studies had a high risk of bias. CONCLUSION Only a minority of studies specifically addressed keloid properties, which makes comparisons between studies challenging. The authors' results suggest that keloid location, duration prior to treatment, size, history of recurrence, and severity are clinically relevant keloid properties that affect treatment efficacy. Further studies are crucial to corroborate the authors' findings, establish a clinically relevant keloid classification, and ultimately develop an evidence-based treatment algorithm that takes these properties into account.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3