Mixed Methods Assessment of Incivility During Surgical Mortality and Morbidity Conference

Author:

Abahuje Egide1,Yang Sohae1,Hu Yue-Yung12,Alam Hasan B.1,Rosenblatt Audrey3,Ballard Heather3,Slocum John Dwight1,Stey Anne M,Johnson Julie K.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA

2. Pediatric Surgery, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, IL, USA

3. Department of Pediatric Anesthesiology, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, IL, USA

Abstract

Objective: This study assessed incivility during Mortality and Morbidity (M&M) Conference. Background: A psychologically safe environment at M&M Conference enables generative discussions to improve care. Incivility and exclusion demonstrated by “shame and blame” undermine generative discussion. Methods: We used a convergent mixed-methods design to collect qualitative data through non-participant observations of M&M conference and quantitative data through standardized survey instruments of M&M participants. The M&M conference was attended by attending surgeons (all academic ranks), fellows, residents, medical students on surgery rotation, advanced practice providers, and administrators from the department of surgery. A standardized observation guide was developed, piloted and adapted based on expert non-participant feedback. The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short-Form (PANAS) and the Uncivil Behavior in Clinical Nursing Education (UBCNE) survey instruments were distributed to the Department of Surgery clinical faculty and categorical general surgery residents in an academic medical center. Results: We observed 11 M&M discussions of 30 cases, over six months with four different moderators. Case presentations (virtual format) included clinical scenario, decision-making, operative management, complications, and management of the complications. Discussion was free form, without a standard structure. The central theme that limited discussion participation from attending surgeon of record, as well as absence of a systems-approach discussion led to blame and blame then set the stage for incivility. Among 147 eligible to participate in the survey, 54 (36.7%) responded. Assistant professors had a 2.60 higher Negative Affect score (p-value=0.02), a 4.13 higher Exclusion Behavior score (p-value=0.03), and a 7.6 higher UBCNE score (p-value=0.04) compared to associate and full professors. Females had a 2.7 higher Negative Affect Score compared to males (p-value=0.04). Conclusion: Free-form M&M discussions led to incivility. Structuring discussion to focus upon improving care may create inclusion and more generative discussions to improve care.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3