Generating a Prioritised List of Operative Procedures for Simulation-Based Assessment of General Surgery Trainees through Consensus

Author:

Toale Conor1,Morris Marie1,Konge Lars2,Nayahangan Leizl Joy2,Roche Adam3,Heskin Leonie13,Kavanagh Dara O1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgical Affairs, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland

2. Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, University of Copenhagen

3. Department of Simulation, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland

Abstract

Objective: to develop appropriate content for high-stakes simulation-based assessments of operative competence in general surgery training through consensus. Summary Background Data: Valid methods of summative operative competence assessment are required by competency-based training programmes in surgery. Method: An online Delphi consensus study was conducted. Procedures were derived from the competency expectations outlined by the Joint Commission on Surgical Training (JCST) curriculum 2021, and subsequent brainstorming. Procedures were rated according to their perceived importance, perceived procedural risk, how frequently they are performed, and feasibility, by a purposive sample of thirty surgical trainers and a five-person steering group. A modified Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation Needs Assessment Formula (CAMES NAF) was applied to generated data in order to produce ranked procedural lists, which were returned to participants for re-prioritization. Results: Prioritised lists were generated for simulation-based operative competence assessments at two key stages of training; end of ‘phase 2’ prior to development of a sub-specialty interest, and end of ‘phase 3’ i.e. end-of-training certification. A total of 21 and 16 procedures were deemed suitable for assessments at each of these stages respectively. Conclusions: This study describes a national needs assessment approach to content generation for simulation-based assessments of operative competence in general surgery using Delphi consensus methodology. The prioritised procedural lists generated by this study can be used to further develop operative skill assessments for use in high-stakes scenarios such as trainee progression, entrustment and end-of-training certification prior to subsequent validity testing.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3