Changing patterns and surgical outcomes of small bowel obstruction in the era of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer

Author:

Liang Jin-Tung1,Liao Yu-Tso2,Chen Tzu-Chun3,Huang John1,Hung Ji-Shiang1

Affiliation:

1. Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC

2. Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan, ROC

3. Department of Surgical Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to investigate whether the incidence, patterns, and surgical outcomes of small bowel obstruction (SBO) have changed in the era of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for primary colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent laparotomy for SBO were divided into MIS and traditional open surgery (TOS) groups based on the previous colorectal cancer operation technique used. The MIS group was selected from 1,544 consecutive patients who underwent MIS as a treatment for primary CRCs between 2014 and 2022, while the TOS group was selected from 1,604 consecutive patients who underwent TOS as a treatment for primary CRCs between 2004 and 2013. The demographics, clinicopathological features, and surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: The SBO incidence in patients who underwent MIS for primary CRC was significantly lower than that in patients who underwent TOS (4.4%, n=68/1544 vs. 9.7%, n=156/1604, P<0.0001). Compared with the TOS group, the MIS group had significantly different (P<0.0001) SBO patterns: adhesion (48.5% vs. 91.7%), internal herniation (23.5% vs. 2.6%), external herniation (11.8% vs. 1.9%), twisted bowel limbs (4.4% vs. 0.6%), ileal volvulus with pelvic floor adhesion (5.9% vs. 1.9%), and nonspecific external compression (5.9% vs. 1.3%). A subset analysis of patients with adhesive SBO (ASBO) showed that the MIS group tended to (P<0.0001) have bands or simple adhesions (75.8%), whereas the TOS group predominantly had matted-type adhesions (59.4%). Furthermore, SBO in the MIS group had an acute (<3 months) or early (3–12 months) onset (64.7%), while that in the TOS group (P<0.0001) had an intermediate or a late onset. When the surgical outcomes of SBO were evaluated, the TOS group had significantly more (P<0.0001) blood loss and longer operation time; however, no significant difference was observed in the surgical morbidity/mortality (Clavien-Dindo classification ≧3, 11.8% vs. 14.1%, P=0.6367), hospitalization, and readmission rates between the two groups. Postoperative follow-up showed that the estimated 3-year (11.37% vs. 18.8%) and 6-year (25.54% vs. 67.4%) recurrence rates of SBO were significantly lower ( P =0.016) in the MIS group than in the TOS group. Conclusions: The wide adoption of MIS to treat primary CRC has led to a lower incidence, altered patterns, and reduced recurrence rates of SBO. Awareness of this new trend will help develop surgical techniques to prevent incomplete restoration of anatomical defects and bowel malalignments specifically associated with MIS for CRC, as well as facilitate timely and appropriate management of SBO complications whenever they occur.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine,Surgery

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3