The Effect of Anesthetic Technique on Postoperative Outcomes in Hip Fracture Repair

Author:

O’Hara Dorene A.1,Duff Amy2,Berlin Jesse A.3,Poses Roy M.4,Lawrence Valerie A.5,Huber Elizabeth C.6,Noveck Helaine2,Strom Brian L.7,Carson Jeffrey L.8

Affiliation:

1. Associate Professor of Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School. Current position: New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York.

2. Research Teaching Specialist, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School.

3. Professor, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, the Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

4. Associate Professor of Medicine and Community Health, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island; the Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, Pawtucket, Rhode Island.

5. Associate Professor of Medicine, Division of General Medicine, Audie Murphy Division, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, and the Department of Medicine, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.

6. Assistant Professor, Division of General Internal Medicine, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia.

7. Professor and Chair, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, the Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and the Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

8. Richard C. Reynolds Professor of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School.

Abstract

Background The impact of anesthetic choice on postoperative mortality and morbidity has not been determined with certainty. Methods The authors evaluated the effect of type of anesthesia on postoperative mortality and morbidity in a retrospective cohort study of consecutive hip fracture patients, aged 60 yr or older, who underwent surgical repair at 20 US hospitals between 1983 and 1993. The primary outcome was defined as death within 30 days of the operative procedure. The secondary outcomes were postoperative 7-day mortality, postoperative myocardial infarction, postoperative pneumonia, postoperative congestive heart failure, and postoperative change in mental status. Numerous comorbid conditions were controlled for individually and by several comorbidity indices using logistic regression. Results General anesthesia was used in 6,206 patients (65.8%) and regional anesthesia in 3,219 patients (3,078 spinal anesthesia and 141 epidural anesthesia). The 30-day mortality rate in the general anesthesia group was 4.4%, compared with 5.4% in the regional anesthesia group (unadjusted odds ratio = 0.80; 95% confidence interval = 0.66-0.97). However, the adjusted odds ratio for general anesthesia increased to 1.08 (0.84-1.38). The adjusted odds ratios for general anesthesia versus regional anesthesia for the 7-day mortality was 0.90 (0.59-1.39) and for postoperative morbidity outcomes were as follows: myocardial infarction: adjusted odds ratio = 1.17 (0.80-1.70); congestive heart failure: adjusted odds ratio = 1.04 (0.80-1.36); pneumonia: adjusted odds ratio = 1.21 (0.87-1.68); postoperative change in mental status: adjusted odds ratio = 1.08 (0.95-1.22). Conclusions The authors were unable to demonstrate that regional anesthesia was associated with better outcome than was general anesthesia in this large observational study of elderly patients with hip fracture. These results suggest that the type of anesthesia used should depend on factors other than any associated risks of mortality or morbidity.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Reference39 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3