Affiliation:
1. Department of Nuclear Medicine – PET/CT, ‘Theageneio’ Cancer Center, Thessaloniki,
2. Department of Nuclear Medicine – PET/CT, ‘Evaggelismos’ General Hospital, Athens and
3. Laboratory of Medical Physics and Digitial Innovation, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
Abstract
Objective
This study compared the radiomic features and quantitative biomarkers of 18F-PSMA-1007 [prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)] and 18F-fluorocholine (FCH) PET/computed tomography (CT) in prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) enrolled in the phase 3, prospective, multicenter BIO-CT-001 trial.
Methods
A total of 106 patients with BCR, who had undergone primary definitive treatment for prostate cancer, were recruited to this prospective study. All patients underwent one PSMA and one FCH PET/CT examination in randomized order within 10 days. They were followed up for a minimum of 6 months. Pathology, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA doubling time, PSA velocity, and previous or ongoing treatment were analyzed. Using LifeX software, standardized uptake value (SUV) maximum, SUVmean, PSMA and choline total volume (PSMA-TV/FCH-TV), and total lesion PSMA and choline (TL-PSMA/TL-FCH) of all identified metastatic lesions in both tracers were calculated.
Results
Of the 286 lesions identified, the majority 140 (49%) were lymph node metastases, 118 (41.2%) were bone metastases and 28 lesions (9.8%) were locoregional recurrences of prostate cancer. The median SUVmax value was significantly higher for 18F-PSMA compared with FCH for all 286 lesions (8.26 vs. 4.99, respectively, P < 0.001). There were statistically significant differences in median SUVmean, TL-PSMA/FCH, and PSMA/FCH-TV between the two radiotracers (4.29 vs. 2.92, 1.97 vs. 1.53, and 7.31 vs. 4.37, respectively, P < 0.001). The correlation between SUVmean/SUVmax and PSA level was moderate, both for 18F-PSMA (r = 0.44, P < 0.001; r = 0.44, P < 0.001) and FCH (r = 0.35, P < 0.001; r = 0.41, P < 0.001). TL-PSMA/FCH demonstrated statistically significant positive correlations with both PSA level and PSA velocity for both 18F-PSMA (r = 0.56, P < 0.001; r = 0.57, P < 0.001) and FCH (r = 0.49, P < 0.001; r = 0.51, P < 0.001). While patients who received hormone therapy showed higher median SUVmax values for both radiotracers compared with those who did not, the difference was statistically significant only for 18F-PSMA (P < 0.05).
Conclusion
Our analysis using both radiomic features and quantitative biomarkers demonstrated the improved performance of 18F-PSMA-1007 compared with FCH in identifying metastatic lesions in prostate cancer patients with BCR.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)