Brain PET and SPECT imaging and quantification: a survey of the current status in the UK

Author:

Michopoulou Sofia K.12,Dickson John C.3,Gardner Glen G.4,Gee Thomas R.2,Fenwick Andrew J.5,Melhuish Timothy2,Monaghan Clare A.4,O’Brien Neil2,Prosser Angus M.J.1,Scott Catherine J.3,Staff Roger T.6,Taylor Jonathan7

Affiliation:

1. Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton

2. Imaging Physics, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton

3. Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London Hospitals, London

4. Department of Nuclear Medicine, NHS Tayside, Dundee

5. National Physical Laboratory, Teddington

6. Imaging Physics, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen

7. Nuclear Medicine & 3DLab, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK

Abstract

Objectives With disease-modifying therapies in development for neurological disorders, quantitative brain imaging techniques become increasingly relevant for objective early diagnosis and assessment of response to treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of Brain SPECT and PET scans in the UK and explore drivers and barriers to using quantitative analysis through an online survey. Methods A web-based survey with 27 questions was used to capture a snapshot of brain imaging in the UK. The survey included multiple-choice questions assessing the availability and use of quantification for DaTscan, Perfusion SPECT, FDG PET and Amyloid PET. The survey results were reviewed and interpreted by a panel of imaging experts. Results Forty-six unique responses were collected and analysed, with 84% of responses from brain imaging sites. Within these sites, 88% perform DaTscan, 50% Perfusion SPECT, 48% FDG PET, and 33% Amyloid PET, while a few sites use other PET tracers. Quantitative Brain analysis is used in 86% of sites performing DaTscans, 40% for Perfusion SPECT, 63% for FDG PET and 42% for Amyloid PET. Commercial tools are used more frequently than in-house software. Conclusion The survey showed variations across the UK, with high availability of DaTscan imaging and quantification and lower availability of other SPECT and PET scans. The main drivers for quantification were improved reporting confidence and diagnostic accuracy, while the main barriers were a perception of a need for an appropriate database of healthy controls and a lack of training, time, and software availability.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Deep Learning Artificial Intelligence for Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography: A Comprehensive Overview and Future Perspectives;2024 7th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Big Data (ICAIBD);2024-05-24

2. Research and Applications of Neurotechnologies for Leadership;Advances in Business Strategy and Competitive Advantage;2024-04-26

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3