A Systematic Review of Questionnaires Assessing Patient Satisfaction in Plastic Surgery: Tools, Topics, and Surgical Types

Author:

Gelidan Adnan G.1,Al Qurashi Abdullah A.23,Dahlawi Maryam4,Hafiz Bayan F.4,Halawani Ibrahim R.5,Mandora Roaa M.4,Tariq Shahad4,Hennawi Yasser B.4,Bukhari Rahaf I.4,Alobaidi Hussain Amin2

Affiliation:

1. Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

2. College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences at the National Guards, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

3. King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

4. Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca, Saudi Arabia

5. Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Abstract

Background: Patient satisfaction is crucial for evaluating healthcare services, including plastic surgery. This systematic review aims to analyze questionnaires assessing patient satisfaction in plastic surgery, identifying their strengths and weaknesses to improve outcomes and enhance the quality of care. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using electronic databases. Studies were included if they were original research articles, written in English, and focused on patient satisfaction questionnaires in plastic surgery. Data extraction and descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Results: A total of 105 studies were included. General/overall satisfaction was the most common topic addressed (99.04%). Cosmetic outcomes were the most frequently assessed category (34.3%). Breast reconstruction was the most common procedure (33.3%). Most studies used a combination of generic and procedure-specific questionnaires (45.71%). The most frequently used measurement tools were BREAST-Q and self-developed questionnaires, each accounting for 28.57% and 27.61%. Conclusions: This review provides a comprehensive analysis of patient satisfaction questionnaires in plastic surgery, emphasizing the importance of a holistic approach and well-established, validated tools. The findings contribute to improving plastic surgery outcomes and enhancing the quality of care. Future research should refine assessment tools to address patients’ needs and promote patient-centered outcomes in plastic surgery.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference120 articles.

1. Wait times, patient satisfaction scores, and the perception of care.;Bleustein;Am J Manag Care,2014

2. Patient perceptions of the quality of health services.;Sofaer;Annu Rev Public Health,2005

3. Understanding the effect of breast augmentation on quality of life: prospective analysis using the BREAST-Q.;Alderman;Plast Reconstr Surg,2014

4. Predictors of patient satisfaction in surgery.;Mira;Surgery,2009

5. The BREAST-Q: further validation in independent clinical samples.;Cano;Plast Reconstr Surg,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3