Integration of Virtual and Traditional Medical Education: Scholarship Pivots from the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author:

Berberoglu Ipek12,Tang Sherry Y. Q.2,Kozlow Jeffrey H.2,Sezgin Billur1,Sandhu Gurjit3,Cederna Paul S.2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

2. Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.

3. Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.

Abstract

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic required an unprecedented transformation of medical education, shifting from traditional, in-person learning to distanced, online learning. This study aimed to review changes to medical education and describe the advantages and disadvantages of virtual medical education experienced by medical students during the pandemic. Methods: An online survey study was conducted at two medical schools, University of Michigan Medical School in the United States and Koc University School of Medicine in Turkey. Medical students completed questionnaires regarding their educational experience before and during the pandemic. Survey instruments were designed to assess differences in the educational curriculum, study methods, clinical skills self-evaluations, perceptions of the quality of in-person and online learning, and overall satisfaction. Results: A total of 184 medical students completed the survey. There was an increase in the use of online study tools since the pandemic. There was no statistically significant difference in self-reported assessments of clinical preparedness and overall clinical competence during surgical clerkship. The percentage of students interested in pursuing a career in surgery has nearly doubled from 34% to 63%. A majority of students (83%) believed that the time available for self-study and research increased during the pandemic. Fifty-two percent of students believed that online education is less efficacious than in-person education, but 86% of students still preferred a blended approach. Conclusions: Medical schools have continued to update their curricula following the COVID-19 pandemic. This study illustrates the transformations in medical education to ensure that the most effective and suitable teaching is delivered.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference24 articles.

1. Online education in the post-COVID era.;Lockee;Nat Electron,2021

2. Integrating virtual teaching in a new era of medical education: lessons from a neurology course.;Kaplan;Adv Med Educ Pract,2023

3. How the COVID-19 pandemic impacted medical education during the last year of medical school: a class survey.;Franklin;Life (Basel),2021

4. Medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic.;Kaul;Chest,2021

5. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical education.;Al Samaraee;Br J Hosp Med (Lond),2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3