Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis for Laparoscopic Surgery: A Survey of Members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the use of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis for laparoscopic surgery among members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO).MethodsA 23-item questionnaire was sent to all working/eligible SGO member e-mail addresses (n = 1356). Data were collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics. χ2 was used to determine differences in responses between groups.ResultsOf the 287 (21.2%) responding SGO members, most (61.3%) estimated the risk of VTE for laparoscopic surgery between 1% and 2%. Most (51.2%) of respondents did not routinely use preoperative pharmacoprophylaxis, and most discontinued prophylaxis upon hospital discharge, regardless of benign (73.5%) or malignant (53.3%) pathology. Combination prophylaxis was preferred for procedures in the setting of intermediate- (50.2%) or high-complexity (78%), malignancy (70.7%), obesity (71.4%), multiple medical comorbidities (76%), or the elderly (64.5%). When compared with respondents of greater surgical volume, respondents who performed less than 5 laparoscopic cases per month were more likely to use sequential compression devices alone in the setting of malignancy (52.6%, P = 0.025). The omission of VTE prophylaxis was rare and varied depending on the patient scenario (0.7%–3.5%). When compared with younger respondents, those who were 61 to 70 years old more frequently omitted VTE prophylaxis in the setting of low-complexity procedures (22.2%, P = 0.003), obesity (11.1%, P = 0.021), multiple medical comorbidities (11.1%, P = 0.008), and the elderly (11.1%, P = 0.009).ConclusionsAmong SGO members, the preferred method of VTE prophylaxis during laparoscopic surgery for several high-risk patient scenarios was combination prophylaxis. The use versus nonuse and the preferred method of VTE prophylaxis were influenced by respondent age and surgical volume.