Was It Worth It? Critical Evaluation of a Novel Outcomes Measure in Oncologic Palliative Surgery

Author:

Cohen Joshua T1,Beard Rachel E1,Cioffi William G1,Miner Thomas J1

Affiliation:

1. From the Department of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient selection for palliative surgery is complex, and appropriate outcomes measures are incompletely defined. We explored the usefulness of a specific outcomes measure “was it worth it” in patients after palliative-intent operations for advanced malignancy. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of a comprehensive longitudinal palliative surgery database was performed at an academic tertiary care center. All patients who underwent palliative-intent operation for advanced cancer from 2003 to 2022 were included. Patient satisfaction (“was it worth it”) was reported within 30 days of operation after palliative-intent surgery. RESULTS: A total of 180 patients were identified, and 81.7% self-reported that their palliative surgery was “worth it.” Patients who reported that their surgery was “not worth it” were significantly older and were more likely to have recurrent symptoms and to need reoperation. There was no significant difference in overall, recurrence-free, and reoperation-free survival for patients when comparing “worth it” with “not worth it.” Initial symptom improvement was not significantly different between groups. Age older than 65 years (hazard ratio 0.25, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.80, p = 0.03), family engagement (hazard ratio 6.71, 95% CI 1.49 to 31.8, p = 0.01), and need for reoperation (hazard ratio 0.042, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.16, p < 0.0001) were all independently associated with patients reporting that their operation was “worth it.” CONCLUSIONS: Here we demonstrate that simply asking a patient “was it worth it” after a palliative-intent operation identifies a distinct cohort of patients that traditional outcomes measures fail to distinguish. Family engagement and durability of an intervention are critical factors in determining patient satisfaction after palliative intervention. These data highlight the need for highly individualized care with special attention paid to patients self-reporting that their operation was “not worth it.”

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Palliative Surgery: When To and When Not To?;Recent Strategies in High Risk Surgery;2024

2. Invited Commentary;Journal of the American College of Surgeons;2023-04-04

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3