Benchmarking Pediatric Trauma Care in Mixed Trauma Centers: Adult Risk-Adjusted Mortality is not a Reliable Indicator of Pediatric Outcomes

Author:

Melhado Caroline12,Evans Lauren L12,Miskovic Amy3,Subacius Haris3,Nathens Avery B34,Stein Deborah M5,Burd Randall S6,Jensen Aaron R12

Affiliation:

1. Division of Pediatric Surgery, UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital Oakland, Oakland, CA

2. Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA

3. American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL

4. Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON

5. Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

6. Division of Burn and Trauma Surgery, Children’s National Medical Center, Washington, DC

Abstract

Background: Trauma center benchmarking has become standard practice for assessing quality. American College of Surgeons (ACS) adult trauma center verification standards do not specifically require participation in a pediatric-specific benchmarking program. Centers that treat adults and children may therefore rely solely on adult benchmarking metrics as a surrogate for pediatric quality. This study assessed discordance between adult and pediatric mortality within mixed trauma centers to determine the need to independently report pediatric-specific quality metrics. Study Design: A cohort of trauma centers (n=493, including 347 adult-only, 44 pediatric-only, and 102 mixed) that participated in the ACS Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) in 2017-2018 was analyzed. Center-specific observed-to-expected mortality estimates were calculated using TQIP adult inclusion criteria for 449 centers treating adults (16-65 years) and using TQIP pediatric inclusion criteria for 146 centers treating children (0-15 years). We then correlated risk-adjusted mortality estimates for pediatric and adult patients within mixed centers and evaluated concordance of their outlier status between adults and children. Results: The cohort included 394,075 adults and 97,698 children. Unadjusted mortality was 6.1% in adults and 1.2% in children. Mortality estimates had only moderate correlation (r=0.41) between adult and pediatric cohorts within individual mixed centers. Mortality outlier status for adult and pediatric cohorts was discordant in 31% (32/102) of mixed centers (weighted kappa-statistic 0.06 [-0.11, 0.22]), with 78% (n=23/32) of discordant centers having higher odds of mortality for children than for adults (6 centers with average adult mortality and high pediatric mortality and 17 centers with low adult mortality and average pediatric mortality, p<0.01). Conclusions: Adult mortality is not a reliable surrogate for pediatric mortality in mixed trauma centers. Incorporation of pediatric-specific benchmarks should be required for centers that admit children.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A Common-Sense Approach to Improving Pediatric Trauma Care in Mixed Trauma Centers;Journal of the American College of Surgeons;2023-12-22

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3