Messaging about HIV Transmission Risk When Viral Load Is Undetectable: Reactions and Perceived Accuracy among US Sexual Minority Men

Author:

Calabrese Sarah K.12ORCID,Zaheer Myra A.13,Flores Justino J.1,Kalwicz David A.1,Modrakovic Djordje X.1,Rao Sharanya1,Dovidio John F.4,Zea Maria Cecilia1,Eaton Lisa A.5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA

2. Department of Prevention and Community Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA

3. School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA

4. Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA

5. Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA

Abstract

Background: Scientific evidence indicates that HIV viral suppression to an undetectable level eliminates sexual transmission risk ("Undetectable=Untransmittable” or “U=U”). However, U=U messaging has been met with skepticism among sexual minority men (SMM) and others. In this survey-based experiment, we manipulated messaging about HIV risk and examined reactions and perceived message accuracy among US SMM. Methods: SMM living with HIV (n=106) and HIV-negative/status-unknown SMM (n=351) participated in an online survey (2019-2020). Participants were randomly assigned to one of three messaging conditions, which varied by level of HIV sexual transmission risk associated with an undetectable viral load (No Risk [U=U]/Low Risk/Control). Participants reported reactions, message accuracy, and reasons for perceiving inaccuracy. We coded open-response data (reactions and reasons) into conceptual categories (e.g., “Enthusiasm”). We compared reactions, accuracy ratings, and reasons by condition and serostatus. Results: In the No Risk Condition, common reactions were Enthusiasm (40.0%), Skepticism/Disagreement (20.0%), and Agreement (19.4%), reactions common to comparison conditions. A higher percentage of HIV-negative/status-unknown participants (24.1%) expressed Skepticism/Disagreement in the No Risk Condition compared with other conditions (3.2%-9.7%). Participants living with HIV were more likely than HIV-negative/status-unknown participants to perceive all messages as accurate. In the No Risk Condition, common reasons for perceiving inaccuracy were Risk Misstated (46.1%), Oversimplified/Caveats Needed (17.1%), and Personal Unfamiliarity/Uncertainty (14.5%), reasons common to comparison conditions. Across conditions, 10.3% of participants attributed message inaccuracy to misdefinition of undetectable. Conclusion: Most SMM reacted favorably to U=U messaging. However, many—especially HIV-negative/status-unknown SMM—expressed skepticism. Interventions are needed to enhance U=U understanding and acceptance.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3