Visual outcomes comparing emmetropia versus mini-monovision following bilateral implantation of a non-diffractive extended vision intraocular lens:randomized trial

Author:

Vasavada Vaishali1,Vasavada Shail A.1,Shastri Lajja1,Nath Vandana1,Vasavada Abhay R.1ORCID,Srivastava Samaresh1,Vasavada Vaishali1

Affiliation:

1. Raghudeep Eye Hospital, Gurukul Road, Ahmedabad – 380052, Gujarat, India.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare visual outcomes and patient satisfaction following bilateral implantation of a non-diffractive extended vision intraocular lens(IOL) when targeting emmetropia versus mini-monovision Setting: Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre,India Design: Prospective,randomized controlled trial Methods: Patients undergoing bilateral cataract surgery with an extended vision IOL(Vivity, Alcon Laboratories, USA) randomized to: group I- IOL implantation with emmetropic target in both eyes, or group II- IOL implantation with mini-monovision of -0.5 diopters(D). Outcome measures evaluated 6 months postoperatively were: unaided and corrected near visual acuity(UNVA, CNVA) at 40 centimeters(cm), unaided and corrected distance(UDVA, CDVA) and intermediate (UIVA, CIVA) visual acuity at 66cm. Mesopic contrast sensitivity, binocular defocus curve, patient reported spectacle independence questionnaire and satisfaction on the McAlinden questionnaire were also assessed. Results: 70 patients enrolled in study. 34 and 33 patients in groups I and II completed follow-up. Binocular UNVA was significantly better in group II (0.26+0.05 vs 0.22+0.08 LogMAR, P=0.03). Reading add required in group II was significantly lower. UIVA (0.09+0.06 vs 0.07+0.08 LogMAR, P=0.15) and UDVA (0.02+0.04 vs 0.02+0.05 LogMAR, P=0.78) were not significantly different between groups. Mesopic contrast sensitivity was not significantly different between the groups. Binocular defocus curve showed significantly better mean visual acuities between -2.0 to -3.0 diopters in group II. Patients in both groups had high levels of spectacle independence, with no patient reporting dysphotopsia. Conclusion: Binocular UNVA was significantly better, with comparable UDVA and mesopic contrast sensitivity when targeting mini monovision with the non-diffractive extended vision IOL as compared to targeting binocular emmetropia.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference25 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3