Primary Intensivists and Nurses for Long-Stay Patients: A Survey of Practices and Perceptions at Academic PICUs*

Author:

Williams Erin P.12,Madrigal Vanessa N.34,Leone Tina A.5,Aponte-Patel Linda6,Baird Jennifer D.7,Edwards Jeffrey D.6

Affiliation:

1. Cohen Children’s Medical Center, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY.

2. Columbia University Vagelos College of Physician and Surgeons, New York, NY.

3. Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC.

4. Pediatric Ethics Program, Children’s National Medical Center, Washington, DC.

5. Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physician and Surgeons, New York, NY.

6. Section of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physician and Surgeons, New York, NY.

7. Institute for Nursing and Interprofessional Research, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the prevalence of the utilization of primary intensivists and primary nurses for long-stay patients in large, academic PICU and ascertain how these practices are operationalized and perceived. Design: A cross-sectional survey. Setting: U.S. PICUs with accredited Pediatric Critical Care Medicine fellowships. Subjects: One senior physician and one senior nurse at each institution. Intervention: None. Measurements and Main Results: Separate but largely analogous questionnaires for intensivists and nurses were created using an iterative process to enhance content/face validity and readability. Sixty-seven intensivists (representing 93% of the 72 institutions with fellowship programs and their PICUs) and 59 nurses (representing 82%) responded. Twenty-four institutions utilize primary intensivists; 30 utilize primary nurses; and 13 utilize both. Most institutions use length of stay and/or other criteria (e.g., medical complexity) for eligibility. Commonly, not all patients that meet eligibility criteria receive primaries. Primary providers are overwhelmingly volunteers, and often only a fraction of providers participate. Primary intensivists at a large majority (>75%) of institutions facilitate information sharing and decision-making, attend family/team meetings, visit patients/families regularly, and are otherwise available upon request. Primary nurses at a similar majority of institutions provide consistent bedside care, facilitate information sharing, and attend family/team meetings. A large majority of respondents thought that primary intensivists increase patient/family satisfaction, reduce their stress, improve provider communication, and reduce conflict, whereas primary nurses similarly increase patient/family satisfaction. More than half of respondents shared that these practices can sometimes require effort (e.g., time and emotion), complicate decision-making, and/or reduce staffing flexibility. Conclusions: Primary practices are potential strategies to augment rotating PICU care models and better serve the needs of long-stay and other patients. These practices are being utilized to varying extents and with some operationalization uniformity at large, academic PICUs.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3