Abstract
In June 2020, Massachusetts became the first state to implement a comprehensive flavored tobacco restriction. One concern was that Massachusetts residents would travel to New Hampshire to purchase restricted products. This article assesses tobacco sales in both states post–law implementation. Retail scanner data were obtained from the Nielsen Company and Information Resources, Inc (IRI), from 1 year pre–law implementation to 2 years post–law implementation. Data post–law implementation were compared with data from 1 year pre–law implementation (baseline). In Massachusetts, 2 years post–law implementation, flavored and menthol tobacco sales decreased by more than 90%. Total sales decreased by around 20%. In New Hampshire, menthol tobacco sales increased (25.1% in IRI and 18.2% in Nielsen), but total sales changed minimally (<5% increase in IRI, <5% decrease in Nielsen). When data from both states were combined, total sales decreased by around 10%. The net decrease in total tobacco sales across Massachusetts and New Hampshire indicates Massachusetts' flavored tobacco restriction resulted in a reduction in tobacco sales despite potential cross-border purchases.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Reference12 articles.
1. Targeted advertising, promotion, and price for menthol cigarettes in California high school neighborhoods;Henriksen;Nicotine Tob Res,2012
2. Cigarette advertising in Black, Latino, and White magazines, 1998-2002: an exploratory investigation;Landrine;Ethn Dis,2005
3. Why we must continue to investigate menthol's role in the African American smoking paradox;Alexander;Nicotine Tob Res,2016
4. Impact of Massachusetts law prohibiting flavored tobacco products sales on cross-border cigarette sales;Ali;PLoS One,2022
5. Impact of Massachusetts' statewide sales restriction on flavored and menthol tobacco products on tobacco sales in Massachusetts and surrounding states, June 2020;Kingsley;Am J Public Health,2022