Twelve Month Outcomes of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery in Patients With Uterovaginal or Posthysterectomy Vaginal Prolapse Enrolled in the Multicenter Pelvic Floor Disorders Registry

Author:

Ferrando Cecile A.1,Bradley Catherine S.2,Meyn Leslie A.3,Brown Heidi W.4,Moalli Pamela A.5,Heisler Christine A.6,Murarka Shivani M.7,Foster Raymond T.8,Chung Doreen E.9,Whitcomb Emily L.10,Gutman Robert E.11,Andy Uduak U.12,Shippey Stuart H.13,Anger Jennifer14,Yurteri-Kaplan Ladin A.15

Affiliation:

1. Center for Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Women’s Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

2. Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA

3. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

4. Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI

5. Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

6. Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI

7. Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN

8. Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women’s Health, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO

9. Department of Urology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY

10. Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Irvine, CA

11. National Center for Advanced Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center/Georgetown University, Washington, DC

12. Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

13. Urogynecology Division, University of Florida Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency; Ascension Sacred Heart, Pensacola, FL

14. Departments of Urology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, UC San Diego Health, San Diego, CA

15. Division of Gynecologic Specialty Surgery, Section of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY.

Abstract

ObjectiveThe aim of the study was to compare 12-month subjective and objective outcomes between 3 approaches to apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery in patients presenting with uterovaginal or posthysterectomy vaginal prolapse enrolled in the Pelvic Floor Disorders Registry for Research.Study DesignThis was an analysis of a multicenter, prospective registry that collected both patient- and physician-reported data for up to 3 years after conservative (pessary) and surgical treatment for POP. Twelve-month subjective and anatomic outcomes for patients who underwent surgical treatment were extracted from the registry for analysis. Pelvic organ prolapse recurrence was defined as a composite outcome and compared between the 3 apical surgery groups (native tissue repair, sacrocolpopexy, colpocleisis) as well as the 2 reconstructive surgery groups (native tissue repair and sacrocolpopexy).ResultsA total of 1,153 women were enrolled in the registry and 777 (67%) opted for surgical treatment, of whom 641 underwent apical repair and were included in this analysis (404 native tissue repair, 187 sacrocolpopexy, and 50 colpocleisis). The overall incidence of recurrence was as follows: subjective 6.5%, anatomic 4.7%, retreatment 7.2%, and composite 13.6%. The incidence of recurrence was not different between the 3 surgical groups. When baseline patient characteristics were controlled for, composite POP recurrence between the native tissue and sacrocolpopexy groups remained statistically nonsignificant. Concurrent perineorrhaphy with any type of apical POP surgery was associated with a lower risk of recurrence (adjusted odds ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.25–0.74;P= 0.002) and prior hysterectomy was associated with a higher risk (adjusted odds ratio, 1.77, 95% confidence interval, 1.04–3.03;P= 0.036).ConclusionPelvic Floor Disorders Registry for Research participants undergoing native tissue apical POP repair, sacrocolpopexy, and colpocleisis surgery had similar rates of POP recurrence 12 months after surgery.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Urology,Obstetrics and Gynecology,Surgery

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3