Bed Rest After Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Century of Expert Opinions in Cecil Textbook of Medicine

Author:

Manu Peter1,Dinu Eleonora-Antoaneta2,Rogozea Liliana M.2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/ Northwell, Hempstead, NY; and

2. Basic, Preventive and Clinical Sciences Department., Transilvania University, Brasov, Romania.

Abstract

Background: Complete bed rest has been a component of the management of acute myocardial infarction, which was first diagnosed in the United States in 1912. The prescribed duration of bed rest has been progressively shortened in the past century. Study Question: What are the milestones of the changes in the expert approach to the duration of bed rest for patients with acute myocardial infarction? Study Design: To determine the changes in the experts' approach to the duration of bed rest after a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, as presented in a widely used textbook in the United States. Data Sources: The chapters presenting the management of myocardial infarction in the 26 editions of Cecil Textbook of Medicine published from 1927 through 2020. Results: Complete rest for 2–6 weeks was recommended by the Cecil's experts from 1927 through 1967. The practice was questioned since the early 1950s, but the recommended duration of bed rest was decreased to 3–4 days only in 1971, after most US hospitals opened coronary care units. The required time in bed was further decreased to 1 day in 1992 and to 12 hours in 2004. By 2007, the literature contained data from 15 trials with a total of 1471 patients kept in bed “longer” and 1487 patients who had been prescribed bed rest for “shorter” periods after an acute uncomplicate myocardial infarction and there was no difference between the groups regarding reinfarction, cardiac mortality, or all-cause mortality. Conclusions: The duration of bed rest after acute myocardial infarction recommended by experts in the United States has had a downward trend with an inflection point in the early 1970s. The change reflected experts' opinion, rather than evidence produced by randomized controlled trials.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3