Outcomes of a Novel Spine Virtual Fracture Clinic in an Australian Tertiary Hospital

Author:

Elias Patrick,Cavka Bernarda,Turner Peter,Ambikaipalan Anuruthran,Cross Emily,Kong Emily,Gibb Kirsty,Yang Yi,Anderson Nathan,Yataganbaba Alper,Cunningham John

Abstract

Study design. This was a retrospective cohort study. Objective. To determine the proportion of referrals diverted by the spine virtual fracture clinic (SVFC) from traditional outpatient clinic management. Summary of background data. The consistent rise in demand for orthopedic outpatient clinic services is creating marked challenges to the provision of quality care. Virtual fracture clinics for upper and lower limb fractures have reduced the burden on outpatient clinics by providing an alternative telehealth management pathway. To date, no study describes the expansion of virtual care to the spine trauma population. Methods. A study of spine fractures referred to the RMH Department of Orthopaedic Surgery was conducted comparing outcomes before (January to December 2021) and following (July 2022 to November 2023) implementation of an SVFC. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a telephone-based SVFC on outpatient clinic activity, represented by the proportion of referrals discharged without requiring an outpatient clinic appointment. Secondary aims included appointment utilization, lost to follow-up rates, duration of care, missed or misdiagnoses, unplanned operations, and complications. Results. Of the 731 referrals managed by the SVFC, 91.1% were discharged without requiring in-person outpatient clinic attendance. Compared with the outpatient clinic historical cohort (150 referrals), SVFC management was associated with reductions in the average number of consultations per referral (1.8 vs. 2.4, P<0.001), appointments not attended (5% vs. 13%, P<0.001), referrals lost to follow-up (0% vs. 10.7%, P<0.001), and a shorter duration of care (median 48 vs. 58 d, P<0.001). A total of 65 patients (8.1%) were redirected to the outpatient clinic, of which three underwent surgical intervention. No diagnostic errors, complications or adverse events were identified. Conclusion. This study demonstrates that an SVFC is an effective and safe alternative pathway to traditional hospital-based outpatient clinics, ith low-risk for any adverse outcomes.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3