Superiority of sugammadex in preventing postoperative pulmonary complications

Author:

Liu Haibei12,Luo Rong12,Cao Shuangjiao12,Zheng Bixing3,Ye Ling3,Zhang Wensheng12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China

2. Translational Neuroscience Center, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China

3. Department of Pain, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China.

Abstract

Abstract Background: Postoperative pulmonary complications often lead to increased mortality and financial burden. Residual paralysis plays a critical role in postoperative pulmonary complications. This meta-analysis was performed to determine whether sugammadex overmatches neostigmine in reducing postoperative pulmonary complications. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Medline through Ovid, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Chinese BioMedical Literature Databases were searched from their inception to 24 June, 2021. Random effects models were used for all analyses. Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the quality of RCTs, while Newcastle Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used to assess for the quality of cohort studies. Results: Seventeen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled data from cohort studies showed reversing neuromuscular blocking with sugammadex had less risk of compound postoperative pulmonary complications (relative risk [RR]: 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60–0.89; P = 0.002; I 2 = 81%), pneumonia (RR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.48–0.86; I 2 = 42%) and respiratory failure (RR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.41–0.56; I 2 = 0%). However, pooled data from RCTs did not show any difference between the two groups in pneumonia (RR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.24–1.40; I 2 = 0%) and no respiratory failure was reported in the included RCTs. The difference was not found between sugammadex and neostigmine about atelectasis in pooled data from either RCTs (RR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.69–1.05; I 2 = 0%) or cohort studies (RR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.87–1.18; I 2 = 0%). Conclusion: The evidence of superiority of sugammadex was limited by the confounding factors in cohort studies and small scale of RCTs. Whether sugammadex precedes neostigmine in preventing pulmonary complications after surgery is still unknown. Well-designed RCTs with large scale are needed. Registration: PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/); CRD 42020191575

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine,General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3