Collaborative Care Cost-Sharing and Referral Rates in Colorado

Author:

Cliff Betsy Q.1,Xie Tiffany H.2,Laiteerapong Neda3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, S. Maryland Ave Chicago, IL

2. Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, S. Maryland Ave Chicago, IL

3. Departments of Medicine and Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL

Abstract

Background: Collaborative care integrates mental health treatment into primary care and has been shown effective. Yet even in states where its use has been encouraged, take-up remains low and there are potential financial barriers to care. Objective: Describe patient out-of-pocket costs and variations in referral patterns for collaborative care in Colorado. Research Design: Retrospective observational study using administrative medical claims data to identify outpatient visits with collaborative care. For individuals with ≥1 visit, we measure spending and visits at the month level. Among physicians with billings for collaborative care, we measure prevalence of eligible patients with collaborative care utilization. Subjects: Patients with Medicare, Medicare Advantage, or commercial health insurance in Colorado, 2018–2019 Outcomes: Out-of-pocket costs (enrollee payments to clinicians), total spending (insurer+enrollee payments to clinicians), percent of patients billed collaborative care. Results: Median total spending (insurer+patient cost) was $48.32 (IQR: $41–$53). Median out-of-pocket cost per month in collaborative care was $8.35 per visit (IQR: $0–$10). Patients with commercial insurance paid the most per month (median: $15); patients with Medicare Advantage paid the least (median: $0). Among clinicians billing for collaborative care (n=193), a mean of 12 percent of eligible patients utilized collaborative care; family practice and advanced practice clinicians' patients utilized it most often. Conclusions: Collaborative care remains underused with fewer than 1 in 6 potentially eligible patients receiving care in this setting. Out-of-pocket costs varied, though were generally low; uncertainty about costs may contribute to low uptake.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference11 articles.

1. Prescribing of psychotropic medication by primary care physicians and psychiatrists;Beardsley;Arch Gen Psychiatry,1988

2. Assessing primary care contributions to behavioral health: a cross-sectional study using medical expenditure panel survey;Jetty;J Prim Care Community Health,2021

3. Increased Recognition of depression in primary care. Comparison between primary-care physician and ICD-10 diagnosis of depression;Berardi;Psychother Psychosom,2005

4. Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems;Archer;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2012

5. Impact of the;Wolk;Am J Manag Care,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3