Comparison of Computer-Assisted Self-Interview Versus Clinician Interview for Self-Reported Vulvovaginal Symptoms-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparison of Computer-Assisted Self-Interview Versus Clinician Interview for Self-Reported Vulvovaginal Symptoms

Published:2023-02-08 Issue:6 Volume:50 Page:e2-e4
ISSN:1537-4521
Container-title:Sexually Transmitted Diseases
language:en
Short-container-title:Sexual Trans Dis

Author:

Robbins Sarah J.,Brown Sarah E.,Stennett Christina A.,Tuddenham Susan¹,Johnston Elizabeth D.²,He Xin,Mark Katrina S.²,Brotman Rebecca M.

Affiliation:

1. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore

Abstract

Abstract This secondary analysis (N = 43) compared computer-assisted self-interview (CASI) to clinician interview for self-report of 8 vulvovaginal symptoms. Concordance was moderate between interview modes (range, 70–86%) with itching and odor having highest agreement. Although prior reports suggest more responses on CASI, we found CASI did not significantly increase self-report of symptoms over clinician interview.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical),Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Dermatology

Reference29 articles.

1. Methodological challenges in research on sexual risk behavior: II. Accuracy of self-reports;Ann Behav Med,2003

2. Association of sexually transmitted disease-related stigma with sexual health care among women attending a community clinic program;Sex Transm Dis,2008

3. Experimenter bias, anxiety, and social desirability;Percept Mot Skills,1962

4. Sensitive questions in surveys;Psychol Bull,2007

5. A randomised controlled trial comparing computer-assisted with face-to-face sexual history taking in a clinical setting;Sex Transm Infect,2007