Corneal Transplantation for Infectious Keratitis: A Prospective Dutch Registry Study

Author:

Veugen Judith M. J.1234ORCID,Dunker Suryan L.12,Wolffs Petra F. G.34,Savelkoul Paul H. M.35,Winkens Bjorn6,van den Biggelaar Frank J. H. M.1,Nuijts Rudy M. M. A.127,Dickman Mor M.12,

Affiliation:

1. University Eye Clinic, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands;

2. School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNs), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands;

3. Department of Medical Microbiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Nutrim School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht, the Netherlands;

4. Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands;

5. Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;

6. Department of Methodology and Statistics, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; and

7. Department of Ophthalmology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, the Netherlands.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze real-world practice patterns and graft survival after corneal transplantation for infectious keratitis in the Netherlands. Methods: All consecutive keratoplasties for infectious keratitis registered in the Netherlands Organ Transplant Registry were included. Graft survival was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier survival curves with Cox regression to compare the 3 most common pathogens with subgroup analysis for type and reason of transplantation, sex, and graft size. Multivariable analysis was performed using the same explanatory factors. Results: Between 2007 and 2017, 1111 keratoplasties for infectious keratitis were registered in the Netherlands Organ Transplant Registry. The most common pathogens were viruses (n = 437), bacteria (n = 271), and Acanthamoeba (n = 121). Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching did not provide a significant survival benefit, whereas emergency procedures showed worse graft survival [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.40, P = 0.120; HR = 2.73, P < 0.001, respectively]. Graft size >8.5 mm was significantly worse than graft size 8.5 mm (HR = 2.062, P = 0.010). In therapeutic keratoplasty, graft survival was significantly worse for Acanthamoeba than viral keratitis (HR = 2.36, P = 0.008). In the multivariable model, adjusting for graft size, type, and reason for transplantation, viral and bacterial keratitis did not differ significantly in graft survival, and Acanthamoeba showed a significantly worse prognosis (vs. viral keratitis, HR = 2.30, P < 0.001; bacterial keratitis, HR = 2.65, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Viral keratitis was the most common indication for transplantation, followed by bacterial and Acanthamoeba keratitis. HLA matching did not offer protection over elective non-HLA–matched procedures, whereas emergency procedures and grafts sized >8.5 mm showed poor survival. In optical keratoplasty, survival is high for all pathogens, whereas in therapeutic keratoplasty Acanthamoeba shows poor outcome.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Ophthalmology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Eye Infections;New England Journal of Medicine;2023-12-21

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3