Outcomes of Pre-Descemet Endothelial Keratoplasty for Failed Therapeutic Penetrating Keratoplasty

Author:

Narang Priya1,Ashok Kumar Dhivya2,Narang Rhea13,Agarwal Amar2

Affiliation:

1. Narang Eye Care and Laser Centre, Ahmedabad, India;

2. Dr. Agarwal's Eye Hospital and Eye Research Centre, Chennai, India; and

3. Smt. NHL Medical College, Ahmedabad, India.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of pre-Descemet endothelial keratoplasty (PDEK) for failed therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty. Methods: This was a retrospective, interventional study that involved 12 eyes of 12 patients with failed therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty that underwent PDEK. All cases had a minimum follow-up of 12 months. The main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity, graft clarity, endothelial cell density loss, and graft survival. Corneal clarity was graded on a scale from 0 to 4, where grade 4 denoted an absolutely clear cornea and grade 0 denoted a totally opaque cornea. Three cases underwent PDEK, 6 cases PDEK with phacoemulsification, and 3 cases underwent PDEK with pupilloplasty. Results: The mean follow-up period for all cases was 18.5 ± 4.9 months. The mean preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (in Snellen decimal equivalent) was 0.02 ± 0.01 and 0.54 ± 0.17, respectively, at the last follow-up. Postoperatively, corneal clarity grade 4 was present in 9 eyes, grade 3 in 2 eyes, and grade 2 in 1 eye. Mild subepithelial haze was noted in 2 eyes. The percentage of endothelial cell density loss was 28.2% ± 10.6%. No correlation was observed between the postoperative graft clarity and preoperative specular count (r = −0.021, P = 0.512). Rebubbling was performed for 1 eye that developed partial graft detachment in the first postoperative week. One patient had an episode of rejection that was managed with systemic and topical steroids. Conclusions: In patients with failed therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty, PDEK can be a useful alternative for visual rehabilitation as it demonstrates favorable visual outcomes with a good graft survival rate.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Ophthalmology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3