To Operate or Not? Balancing Advanced Imaging, Machine Learning, and the Doctor–Patient Relationship in Complex Clinical Decision Making

Author:

Subramanian Tanvi1ORCID,Pocivavsek Luka2,Alverdy John C.3

Affiliation:

1. T. Subramanianis a resident physician, University of Chicago Medical Centera fellow, MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, Chicago, Illinois.

2. L. Pocivavsekis assistant professor of surgery, Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

3. J.C. Alverdyis professor of surgery and executive vice chair, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

Abstract

Advances in high-resolution, cross-sectional imaging have changed the practice of medicine. These innovations have clearly benefited patient care yet have also led to a decreased dependence on the art of medicine, with its emphasis on obtaining a thoughtful history and thorough physical examination to elicit the same diagnosis that imaging provides. What remains to be determined is how physicians can balance these technological advances with their own ability to use clinical experience and judgment. This can be seen not only with the use of high-level imaging but also with the increasing use of machine-learning models throughout medicine. The authors contend that these should be seen not as a replacement for the physician, but as another tool in their arsenal in determining management decisions. These issues are salient for surgeons, who, given the serious undertaking required to operate on a person, must develop trust-based relationship with their patients. Navigating this new field brings with it several ethical conundrums that must be addressed, with the final goal being to provide optimal patient care without sacrificing the human element involved, from either the physician or the patient. The authors examine these less-than-simple challenges, which will continue to develop as physicians use the increasing amount of machine-based knowledge available to them.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Education,General Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3