Evolution of Virtual Surgical Planning Use Among Craniofacial Surgeons

Author:

Moscarelli Jake,Hu Kevin G.,Alper David,Rancu Albert,Salib Andrew,Ihnat Jacqueline M.H.,Parikh Neil,Persing John A.,Alperovich Michael

Abstract

Virtual surgical planning (VSP) has benefits in craniofacial surgery with growing popularity. However, while specific use cases are highlighted in the literature, no studies exist providing an overview of VSP use among craniofacial surgeons, and little is known about the extent of exposure to VSP during plastic surgery training. This study surveyed members of The American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons (ASMS) to better characterize both the landscape of VSP use among practicing craniofacial surgeons and the extent of exposure to VSP throughout surgical training. An electronic survey was administered in the fall of 2023. Response data included surgeon demographics, VSP usage, including the use in residency/fellowship, procedures for which VSP is used, and assessment of VSP’s impact on the surgeon’s practice. Demographics and VSP use were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while categorical and continuous variables were analyzed using χ2 tests and t-tests, respectively. Of the 44 respondents, 40 (90.9%) completed a craniofacial surgery fellowship, and 18 (40.9%) utilized VSP in either residency or fellowship. In respondents’ current practice, VSP is utilized most commonly for orthognathic surgery (n=32, 91.4%), postablative reconstruction (n=23, 82.1%), and facial feminization (n=11, 73.3%). Shorter operative time and improved esthetic outcomes were frequently reported as benefits derived from VSP use. Finally, surgeons in practice for less than 10 years were significantly more likely to have used VSP in both residency (OR=20.3, P<0.01) and in fellowship (OR=40.6, P<0.01) than those practicing for more than 10 years. These findings suggest that craniofacial surgeons apply VSP more commonly for certain procedure types. Our results additionally suggest that incorporation of VSP into residency and fellowship training has become significantly more common over time, with a pivot towards integration in the last decade.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3