Planning for implementation success: insights from conducting an implementation needs assessment

Author:

Graham Nicole D.1,Graham Ian D.12,Vanderspank-Wright Brandi1,Nadalin-Penno Letitia3,Fergusson Dean A.4,Squires Janet E.1

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada

2. School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada

3. Faculty of Environmental and Health Sciences, Canadore College, North Bay, ON, Canada

4. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim: The aim of this paper is to provide insights into conducting an implementation needs assessment using a case example in a less-research-intensive setting. Design and methods: In the case example, an implementation needs assessment was conducted, including 1 an environmental scan of the organization's website and preliminary discussions with key informants to learn about the implementation context, and 2 a formal analysis of the evidence–practice gap (use of sedation interruptions) deploying a chart audit methodology using legal electronic reports. Results: Our needs assessment was conducted over 5 months and demonstrated how environmental scans reveal valuable information that can inform the evidence–practice gap analysis. A well-designed gap analysis, using suitable indicators of best practice, can reveal compliance rates with local protocol recommendations, even with a small sample size. In our case, compliance with the prescribed practices for sedation interruptions ranged from 65% (n=53) to as high as 84% (n=69). Conclusions: Implementation needs assessments provide valuable information that can inform implementation planning. Such assessments should include an environmental scan to understand the local context and identify both current recommended best practices and local best practices for the intervention of interest. When addressing an evidence–practice gap, analyses should quantify the difference between local practice and desired best practice. Impact: The insights gained from the case example presented in this paper are likely transferrable to implementation research or studies conducted in similar, less-research-intensive settings. Spanish abstract: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A257

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3