Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of co-created nursing innovations in a Dutch university hospital

Author:

van der Zanden Myrthe1,Helder Onno23,Westland Heleen4,Ista Erwin1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Internal Medicine, Section Nursing Science, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands

2. Create4Care, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands

3. Research Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, Netherlands

4. Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction: Escalating global nursing shortages require solutions for efficient care, fewer injuries and lost workdays. When commercial solutions are lacking, innovations developed through co-creation can be a viable alternative. However, many co-created nursing innovations are ineffectively implemented. Understanding the barriers and facilitators for the successful implementation of co-created nursing innovations is crucial. Objective: This study explored nurses’ perceived determinants influencing the implementation of co-created nursing innovations. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with nurses at a Dutch university hospital who were working with co-created nursing innovations. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was employed to identify the barriers and facilitators. Data analysis followed a deductive theoretical thematic analysis approach based on the 14 TDF domains. Determinants were labeled as a barrier, facilitator, or both. Results: Of the 14 TDF domains, 9 appeared relevant, including Intention, Professional Role and Identify, and Knowledge. The absence of a “superuser,” lack of storage space, and negative experiences during use were perceived as barriers to the implementation of nursing innovations. The importance of time-saving features, user-friendliness, reminders to use the innovation, and team enthusiasm were perceived as facilitators. Conclusions: Participants confirmed that the Social Influences domain, combined with Behavioral Regulation and Knowledge, were barriers to implementation, while Intentions and Reinforcements and Rewards were seen as facilitators. Spanish abstract: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A235

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference28 articles.

1. The shortage of skilled workers in Europe: its impact on geriatric medicine;Michel;Eur Geriatr Med,2020

2. A systematic review study on the factors affecting shortage of nursing workforce in the hospitals;Tamata;Nurs Open,2023

3. The impact of nurse empowerment on job satisfaction;Ning;J Adv Nursing,2009

4. The effect of interventions on preventing musculoskeletal injuries related to nurses work: systematic review;Sousa;J Pers Med,2023

5. How to bridge the nurse innovation–diffusion gap? An in-depth case study of Create4Care;Rigtering;Front Public Health,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3