Providing a scaffold for considering theoretical frameworks in evidence implementation projects: the JBI approach to evidence implementation

Author:

Munn Zachary1ORCID,McArthur Alexa2,Klugar Miloslav34,Stannard Daphne5,Cooper Adam S.6,Enuameh Yeetey78,Porritt Kylie2

Affiliation:

1. Health Evidence Synthesis, Recommendations and Impact (HESRI), School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia

2. JBI, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia

3. Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech Republic: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Czech GRADE Network, Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic

4. Center of Evidence-based Education and Arts Therapies: A JBI Affiliated Group, Faculty of Education, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic

5. School of Nursing, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA, USA

6. Department of Nursing, San Francisco (UCSF) Medical Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA

7. Kintampo Health Research Centre: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Kintampo, Ghana

8. Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana

Abstract

ABSTRACT There are many theories, models, and frameworks that have been proposed in the field of implementation science. Despite this, many evidence implementation or practice improvement projects do not consider these theories, models, or frameworks in their improvement efforts. The JBI approach is one example of an implementation theory, model, or framework. This approach has been developed particularly with health care professionals in mind and is designed to clearly guide pragmatic evidence implementation efforts based on the best available evidence. In this paper, we discuss how the JBI approach to evidence implementation can interact with and support theory-informed, pragmatic evidence implementation projects.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference53 articles.

1. Criteria for selecting implementation science theories and frameworks: results from an international survey;Birken;Implement Sci,2017

2. Donabedian's lasting framework for health care quality;Ayanian;N Eng J Med,2016

3. Using the Donabedian framework to examine the quality and safety of nursing service innovation;Gardner;J Clin Nurs,2014

4. Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework;Kitson;Qual Health Care,1998

5. Making sense of implementation theories, models, and frameworks;Nilsen;Implement Sci,2015

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3