Implementation of a Bleeding Risk Screening Tool and Hematology Referral Process Prior to Pediatric Endoscopy

Author:

McSorley Brianna1,Chugh Ankur1,Abazi Tea1,Lerner Diana1,Jobe Shawn2,Pan Amy Y.3,Zhang Liyun3,Sharma Ruchika4,Ashai-Khan Farhat1

Affiliation:

1. Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Medical College of Wisconsin/Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI

2. Center for Bleeding and Clotting Disorders, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, East Lansing, MI

3. Division of Quantitative Health Sciences, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI

4. Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.

Abstract

Objectives: Gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic procedures are considered low risk with an overall bleeding risk for upper and lower endoscopies of 0.11%. However, a certain population of patients may have a higher risk for bleeding, and there is not a standardized process for screening patients to determine who these patients are. Methods: At Children’s Wisconsin, our gastroenterology and hematology divisions adapted an abbreviated version of a validated, history-based bleeding risk screening tool and implemented a hematology referral process to identify those at risk for bleeding prior to their first endoscopy. Provider compliance with the bleeding screen, referral to hematology, time to be seen in hematology clinic, new diagnoses of bleeding disorders, and bleeding complications were assessed from 2019 to 2021 across 3 phases. Results: Provider compliance with the bleeding screen improved throughout our study from 48% (120/251) to 75% (189/253). For those who screened positive, compliance with referral to hematology ranged from 38% to 74% across our phases. The overall time to be seen by hematology decreased from 30 days to 7.5 days. Eighteen patients ultimately screened positive and were seen in hematology clinic, of whom 22% (4/18) were diagnosed with a new bleeding disorder. No bleeding complications were seen in our study population. Conclusions: Our quality improvement project provided a standardized screening tool to assess preoperative bleeding risk and reinforced the value of a history-based screening tool. This modified screening tool identified those with an undiagnosed bleeding disorder and preventative measures were undertaken to prevent procedural bleeding complications.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Gastroenterology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference10 articles.

1. Adverse events of upper GI endoscopy.;Ben-Menachem;Gastrointest Endosc,2012

2. ASGE review of adverse events in colonoscopy.;Kothari;Gastrointest Endosc,2019

3. Complications in pediatric endoscopy.;Tringali;Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol,2016

4. Routine preoperative coagulation tests in children undergoing elective surgery or invasive procedures: are they still necessary?;Alzahrani;Clin Med Insights Blood Disord,2019

5. The relevance of the coagulation screen before surgery.;Borges;Br J Hosp Med (Lond),2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3