The Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence-based Pedicle Screw Trajectory Planning in Patients With Different Levels of Bone Mineral Density

Author:

Xiong Xu12,Liu Jia-Ming12,Lu William Weijia34,Yang Ke-Di45,Qi Huan5,Liu Zhi-Li12,Zhang Ning6,Huang Shan-Hu12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University

2. Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Spine and Spinal Cord Diseases, Nanchang

3. Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen

4. Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

5. Bone’s Technology Limited, Shenzhen

6. Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China

Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of pedicle screw trajectory planning based on artificial intelligence (AI) software in patients with different levels of bone mineral density (BMD). Summary of Background Data: AI-based pedicle screw trajectory planning has potential to improve pullout force (POF) of screws. However, there is currently no literature investigating the efficacy of AI-based pedicle screw trajectory planning in patients with different levels of BMD. Methods: The patients were divided into 5 groups (group A–E) according to their BMD. The AI software utilizes lumbar spine CT data to perform screw trajectory planning and simulate AO screw trajectories for bilateral L3-5 vertebral bodies. Both screw trajectories were subdivided into unicortical and bicortical modes. The AI software automatically calculating the POF and pullout risk of every screw trajectory. The POF and risk of screw pullout for AI-planned screw trajectories and AO standard trajectories were compared and analyzed. Results: Forty-three patients were included. For the screw sizes, AI-planned screws were greater in diameter and length than those of AO screws (P<0.05). In groups B–E, the AI unicortical trajectories had a POF of over 200N higher than that of AO unicortical trajectories. POF was higher in all groups for the AI bicortical screw trajectories compared with the AO bicortical screw trajectories (P<0.05). AI unicortical trajectories in groups B–E had a lower risk of screw pullout compared with that of AO unicortical trajectories (P<0.05). Conclusions: AI unicortical screw trajectory planning for lumbar surgery in patients with BMD of 40–120 mg/cm3 can significantly improve screw POF and reduce the risk of screw pullout.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3