Intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery lesions

Author:

Bendary Ahmed1,Elsaed Ahmed2,Tabl Mohamed Abdelshafy1,Ahmed ElRabat Khaled1,Zarif Bassem2

Affiliation:

1. Cardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Egypt

2. National Heart Institute, Cairo, Egypt

Abstract

Background In percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) lesions, intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS) guidance has shown potential for enhancing clinical outcomes. However, studies confirming its superiority to conventional angiographic-guided PCI remain few. This study aimed to assess if IVUS-guided PCI for patients with unprotected LMCA stenosis improves clinical outcomes compared to angiographic-guided PCI. Methods This randomized clinical study enrolled 181 patients with ULMCA lesions scheduled for drug-eluting stent implantation. Patients were split into 90 in the IVUS-guided group and 91 in the conventional group. Procedural characteristics, clinical outcomes, and the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) were evaluated for all patients. The risk reduction associated with IVUS-guided PCI was evaluated using a multivariate Cox regression analysis. Results Patients who underwent IVUS demonstrated significantly higher pre-dilatation before stenting (88.9% vs. 72.5%, P = 0.005), post-dilatation balloon diameter (4.46 ± 0.48 vs. 4.21 ± 0.49, P < 0.001), stent diameter (3.9 ± 0.4 vs. 3.7 ± 0.3, P = 0.002), and pressure for post dilatation (18 ± 3 vs. 16 ± 2, P = 0.001). Regarding 12-month outcomes, patients who underwent IVUS demonstrated significantly lower MACE (3.3% vs. 18.7%, P < 0.001) than those who underwent the conventional method. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that IVUS was related to 84.4% risk reduction of 1-year MACE (HR = 0.156, 95% CI = 0.044–0.556, P = 0.004). Conclusion Compared to angiographic-guided PCI, IVUS-guided PCI resulted in improved clinical results and a markedly reduced risk of MACE in patients with ULMCA lesions.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference19 articles.

1. Left main coronary artery disease-current management and future perspectives.;Dąbrowski;J Clin Med,2022

2. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines.;Lawton;Circulation,2022

3. Percutaneous coronary artery intervention in unprotected left main coronary artery disease: one-year outcome Egyptian registry.;Ayman;Egypt Heart J,2022

4. Intravascular ultrasound imaging-guided versus coronary angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.;Darmoch;J Am Heart Assoc,2020

5. The role of intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention of complex coronary lesions.;Malaiapan;Cardiovasc Diagn Ther,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3