Body Fit With a Pouching System With Concave Contour for People With an Outward Peristomal Body Profile

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to investigate the fit of a two-piece pouching system with a concave-shaped skin barrier on people with an outward peristomal body profile and its effect on leakage, wear time, and quality of life (QoL) related to using an ostomy product. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, open-label, cross-over trial. SUBJECTS AND SETTINGS: The sample comprised 53 subjects with outward peristomal body profiles and problems with leakage of ostomy effluent from their pouching system. Participants were randomized to the concave two-piece pouching system or a comparator (two-piece pouching system with a flat skin barrier) for 3 weeks. Subjects were then crossed over to the opposite skin barrier for an additional 3 weeks. The study was conducted in Denmark, Norway, Germany, and the Netherlands; data were collected in multiple ambulatory clinics or during home visits. METHODS: The primary end point was the ability of the skin barrier to fit body contours; secondary outcomes were leakage of effluent from the pouching system, wear time, and QoL related to using an ostomy product via the validated Ostomy-Q questionnaire. Primary comparisons between concave and comparator pouching systems were evaluated using proportional odds models and mixed models taking test period into account. RESULTS: Analysis included randomized subjects who had been exposed to at least one product and with information on at least one end point (full-analysis-set, n = 52). The concave pouching system provided a better fit to body contours than the comparator (P< .001) and reduced the degree of leakage underneath the skin barrier (LS mean difference = −1.84, 95% CI −3.31 to −0.37; P = .016). Participants experienced fewer episodes of leakage outside the skin barrier when using concave versus comparator pouching system (13.0% vs. 26.7%, respectively). Participants reported significant improvements in QoL (LS mean difference = 14.3; 95% CI 9.4 to 19.2; P < .001). No significant difference in wear time between skin barrier shapes was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings indicate that a pouching system with a concave skin barrier achieved a better body fit on people with an outward peristomal body profile and resulted in fewer leakage incidents and higher QoL compared to using a pouching system with a flat skin barrier.