Investigation and Validation of the TEG6s During Rotary Wing Aeromedical Flight

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction In order to improve rural and austere trauma care, hospital-based testing performed at the point of injury may shorten the time lapsed from injury to intervention. This study aimed to evaluate the use of the TEG6s® device in a rotary wing aircraft. Prior attempts suffered from limitation related to lack of vibration mitigation. Methods This was an investigator initiated, industry supported study. Haemonetics® provided a TEG6s® analyzer. The device underwent a standard validation. It was secured in place on the aircraft utilizing shipping foam for vibration mitigation. Donors provided 2 tubes of sample blood in one sitting. Paired studies were performed on the aircraft during level flight and in the hospital, using the Global Hemostasis with Lysis Cartridge. Both normal and presumed pathologic samples were tested in separate phases. Paired T-tests were performed. Results For normal donors, mean R (minutes) for laboratory compared to the aircraft was 6.2 vs. 7.2 (p = 0.025). Mean CRT MA (mm) was 59.3 and 55.9 ± 7.3 (p < 0.001) for lab and aircraft (p < 0.001). Among normal donors, R was within normal range for 17/18 laboratory and 18/18 aircraft tests (p > 0.99). During the testing of pathologic samples mean R time was 14.8 for lab samples and 12.6 minutes for aircraft (p = 0.02). Aircraft samples were classified as abnormal in 78% of samples, this was not significantly different than lab samples (p = 0.5). Conclusions The use of the TEG6s® for inflight viscoelastic testing appears promising. While statistically significant differences are seen in some results, these values are not considered clinically significant. Classifying samples as normal or abnormal demonstrated a higher correlation. Future studies should focus on longer flight times to evaluate for LY30, takeoff and landing effects. Overall, this study suggests that TEG6s® can be utilized in a prehospital environment, and further study is warranted. Level of Evidence Level II, Diagnostic Tests or Criteria