Author:
Farrell Michael S.,Alseidi Adanan,Byerly Saskya,Fockens Paul,Giberson Frederick A.,Glaser Jeffrey,Horvath Karen,Jones David,Luckhurst Casey,Mowery Nathan,Robinson Bryce R.H.,Rodriguez Allie,Singh Vikesh K.,Siriwardena Ajith K.,Vege Santhi Swaroop,Trikudanathan Guru,Visser Brendan C.,Voermans Rogier P.,Yeh Daniel Dante,Gelbard Rondi B.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The management of acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) has changed dramatically over the past 20 years including the use of less invasive techniques, the timing of interventions, nutritional management, and antimicrobial management. This study sought to create a core outcome set (COS) to help shape future research by establishing a minimal set of essential outcomes that will facilitate future comparisons and pooling of data while minimizing reporting bias.
METHODS
A modified Delphi process was performed through involvement of ANP content experts. Each expert proposed a list of outcomes for consideration, and the panel anonymously scored the outcomes on a 9-point Likert scale. Core outcome consensus defined a priori as >70% of scores receiving 7 to 9 points and <15% of scores receiving 1 to 3 points. Feedback and aggregate data were shared between rounds with interclass correlation trends used to determine the end of the study.
RESULTS
A total of 19 experts agreed to participate in the study with 16 (84%) participating through study completion. Forty-three outcomes were initially considered with 16 reaching consensuses after four rounds of the modified Delphi process. The final COS included outcomes related to mortality, organ failure, complications, interventions/management, and social factors.
CONCLUSION
Through an iterative consensus process, content experts agreed on a COS for the management of ANP. This will help shape future research to generate data suitable for pooling and other statistical analyses that may guide clinical practice.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Therapeutic/Care Management; Level V.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)