Author:
Williams James,Prey Beau,Francis Andrew,Weykamp Michael,Liu Betty,Parsons Michael,Vu Michael,Franko Jace,Roedel Erik,Lallemand Michael,Bingham Jason,Mentzer Steven,Kuckelman John
Abstract
INTRODUCTIONInjuries to the liver and small bowel are common in multiple injuries. While there are currently a variety of accepted damage-control techniques to expeditiously manage such injuries, morbidity and mortality remain high. Pectin polymers have previously been shown to effectively seal visceral organ injuries ex vivo through physiochemical entanglement with the glycocalyx. We sought to compare the standard of care for the management of penetrating liver and small bowel injuries with a pectin-based bioadhesive patch in a live animal model.METHODSFifteen adult male swine underwent a laparotomy with standardized laceration to the liver. Animals were randomized to one of three treatment arms: packing with laparotomy pads (n = 5), suture repair (n = 5), or pectin patch repair (n = 5). Following 2 hours of observation, fluid was evacuated from the abdominal cavity and weighed. Next, a full-thickness small bowel injury was created, and animals were randomized to either a sutured repair (n = 7) or pectin patch repair (n = 8). The segment of bowel was then pressurized with saline, and the burst pressure was recorded.RESULTSAll animals survived the protocol to completion. There were no clinically significant differences between groups regarding baseline vitals or laboratory studies. On one-way analysis of variance, there was a statistically significant difference between groups regarding blood loss after liver repair (26 mL suture vs. 33 mL pectin vs. 142 mL packing,p< 0.01). On post hoc analysis, there was no statistically significant difference between suture and pectin (p= 0.9). After repair, small bowel burst pressures were similar between pectin and suture repair (234 vs. 224 mm Hg,p= 0.7).CONCLUSIONPectin-based bioadhesive patches performed similarly to the standard of care for the management of liver lacerations and full-thickness bowel injuries. Further testing is warranted to assess the biodurability of a pectin patch repair, as it may offer a simple option to effectively temporize traumatic intra-abdominal injuries.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Surgery