A Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes in Patients Managed With Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the First and Second Waves of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United Kingdom

Author:

Garfield Benjamin E.12,Bianchi Paolo1,Arachchillage Deepa J.34,Caetano Francisca1,Desai Sujal56,Doyle James1,Hernandez Caballero Clara1,Doyle Anne-Marie1,Mehta Sachin1,Law Alexander2,Jaggar Sian17,Kokosi Maria58,Molyneaux Philip L.58,Passariello Maurizio1,Naja Meena1,Ridge Carole56,Alçada Joana18,Patel Brijesh12,Singh Suveer15,Ledot Stephane

Affiliation:

1. Department of Adult Intensive Care, Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospitals, part of Guy’s and St Thomas’s NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

2. Division of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine, and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

3. Centre for Haematology, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

4. Department of Haematology, Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospitals, part of Guy’s and St Thomas’s NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

5. National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

6. Department of Radiology, Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospitals, part of Guy’s and St Thomas’s NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

7. Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospitals, part of Guy’s and St Thomas’s NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

8. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospitals, part of Guy’s and St Thomas’s NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Early studies of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in COVID-19 have revealed similar outcomes to historical cohorts. Changes in the disease and treatments have led to differences in the patients supported on venovenous ECMO in the first and second waves. We aimed to compare these two groups in both the acute and follow-up phase. DESIGN: Retrospective single-center cohort study comparing mortality at censoring date (November 30, 2021) and decannulation, patient characteristics, complications and lung function and quality of life (QOL—by European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 3 Level Version) at first follow-up in patients supported on venovenous ECMO between wave 1 and wave 2 of the COVID-19 pandemic. SETTING: Critical care department of a severe acute respiratory failure service. PATIENTS: Patients supported on ECMO for COVID-19 between wave 1 (March 17, 2020, to August 31, 2020) and wave 2 (January 9, 2020, to May 25, 2021). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: One hundred twenty-three patients were included in our analysis. Survival at censoring date (χ2, 6.35; p = 0.012) and decannulation (90.4% vs 70.0%; p < 0.001) was significantly lower in the second wave, while duration of ECMO run was longer (12.0 d [18.0–30.0 d] vs 29.5 d [15.5–58.3 d]; p = 0.005). Wave 2 patients had longer application of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) prior to ECMO and a higher frequency of barotrauma. Patient age and NIV use were independently associated with increased mortality (odds ratio 1.07 [1.01–1.14]; p = 0.025 and 3.37 [1.12–12.60]; p = 0.043, respectively). QOL and lung function apart from transfer coefficient of carbon monoxide corrected for hemoglobin was similar at follow-up across the waves. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with COVID-19 supported on ECMO in both waves survived in the short and longer term. At follow-up patients had similar lung function and QOL across the two waves. This suggests that ECMO has an ongoing role in the management of a carefully selected group of patients with COVID-19.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3