Comparison of Different Treatments of Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Author:

Fei Qiang1,Pan Jiarong1,Zhang Feizhou2,Lin Yu1,Yuan Tianming1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neonatology, Children’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou, China.

2. Department of Pneumology, Children’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou, China.

Abstract

Objectives: Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) is a life-threatening disease. Despite being considered the gold standard treatment scheme, inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) is not readily available in settings with limited resources. Therefore, in recent years, research on related drugs is being actively pursued. Herein, we aimed to use random-effects network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and associated mortality of different PPHN therapies. Data Sources: We electronically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for data up to January 27, 2023. Study Selection: Randomized controlled trials involving neonates with PPHN assessing efficacy and mortality of various treatments. Data Extraction: Details of study population, treatments, and outcomes were extracted. Data Synthesis: Direct pairwise comparisons and a network meta-analysis was performed under random effects. The ranking probability was further assessed based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). We analyzed 23 randomized clinical trials involving 902 newborns with PPHN. Sixteen different treatment strategies were compared with each other and conventional therapy (CON). A median concentration of 10–20 parts per million (ppm) iNO (MNO) coupled with sildenafil orally administered at a dose of 1–3 mg/kg/dose every 6–8 hours (OSID) demonstrated the best efficacy (MNO + OSID vs. CON: odds ratio [OR] = 27.53, 95% CI, 2.36–321.75; SUCRA = 0.818, ranking first; moderate quality). OSID combined with milrinone administered IV also performed well in terms of efficacy (OSID + milrinone vs. CON: OR = 25.13, 95% CI = 1.67–377.78; SUCRA = 0.811, ranking second; low quality) and mortality reduction (CON vs. OSID + milrinone: OR = 25.13, 95% CI = 1.67–377.78; SUCRA = 0.786, ranking last; low quality). Conclusions: MNO + OSID is the most effective PPHN treatment. If iNO is not available, OSID + milrinone is preferred.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3