Affiliation:
1. Department of Nursing, Tokushima University Hospital, Tokushima, Japan.
2. Division of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Department of Surgery Related, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
3. Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.
Abstract
Objectives:
Vibration therapy uses vibration to rehabilitate physical functions. Recently, it has been demonstrated to be safe for critically ill patients. However, its effects on physical functions are unclear.
Design:
Randomized controlled trial.
Setting:
A single-center, ICU.
Patients:
Patients were randomly assigned to either vibration therapy coupled with protocolized mobilization or protocolized mobilization alone. We included patients who could sit at the edge of the bed or in a wheelchair during their ICU stay. The exclusion criteria were based on the early mobilization inhibition criteria.
Interventions:
The primary outcome was the Functional Status Score for the ICU (FSS-ICU) at ICU discharge. Secondary outcomes were the Medical Research Council score, ICU-acquired weakness, delirium, ICU Mobility Scale (IMS), and ventilator- and ICU-free days. For safety assessment, vital signs were monitored during the intervention.
Measurements and Main Results:
Among 180 patients, 86 and 90 patients remained in the vibration therapy and control groups, respectively. The mean age was 69 ± 13 vs. 67 ± 16 years in the vibration therapy and control groups, and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score was 19 (14–25) vs. 18 (13–23). The total FSS-ICU at ICU discharge was 24 (18–27) and 21 (17–26) in the intervention and control groups, respectively (p = 0.09), and the supine-to-sit ability significantly improved in the intervention group (p < 0.01). The secondary outcomes were not significantly different. Vital signs remained stable during vibration therapy. In the predefined subgroup analysis, FSS-ICU improved in the population with a higher body mass index (≥ 23 kg/m2), lower APACHE II scores (< 19), and higher IMS scores (≥ 6).
Conclusions:
Vibration therapy did not improve the total FSS-ICU. However, the supine-to-sit ability in the FSS-ICU improved without any adverse event.
Funder
JSPS KAKENHI
non-profit crowd funding âMuscle Atrophy Zero Projectâ
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献