Development and alpha testing of a patient shared decision aid for prosthesis design for new lower limb prosthesis users

Author:

Anderson Chelsey B.123ORCID,Fatone Stefania4ORCID,Mañago Mark M.12ORCID,Swink Laura A.12ORCID,Kittelson Andrew J.5ORCID,Magnusson Dawn M.1ORCID,Christiansen Cory L.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Physical Therapy Program, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO

2. Department of Research, Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora, CO

3. James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence and the Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Cincinnati, OH

4. Division of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

5. Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Montana, Missoula, MT

Abstract

Background: After lower limb amputation, several prosthesis design options exist. However, prosthesis design decisions do not always reflect a prosthesis user’s needs, values, and preferences. Objective: To develop a patient decision aid (PDA) prototype for prosthetists and new prosthesis users facing prosthesis design decisions after lower limb amputation, and to assess its usability, accuracy, and comprehensibility. Study design: Exploratory mixed methods. Methods: PDA development was informed by a qualitative needs assessment and guided by the International Patient Decision Aid Standards. The PDA was evaluated by steering groups of experienced prosthesis users and prosthetic professionals (prosthetists and researchers) to test usability, accuracy, and comprehensibility through focus groups, individual interviews, and rating on a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 10. Results: The resulting PDA included 6 sections: (1) Amputation and Early Recovery, (2) Communication, (3) Values, (4) Prosthesis Design, (5) Preferences, and (6) Prosthetic Journey. Usability, accuracy, and comprehensibility were rated as 9.2, 9.6, and 9.6, respectively, by prosthetic professionals, and 9.4, 9.6, and 9.6, respectively, by prosthesis users. Discussion: The PDA incorporated guidance by relevant stakeholders and was rated favorably, emphasizing a need for shared decision-making support in prosthesis design. One challenge was determining the amount of information in the PDA, highlighting the diversity in end users’ informational needs. Future iterations of the PDA should undergo beta testing in clinical settings. Conclusions: A standardized, iterative method was used to develop a PDA for new lower limb prosthesis users and prosthetists when considering prosthesis design decisions. The PDA was considered useable, accurate, and comprehensible.

Funder

The Orthotics and Prosthetics Foundation for Education and Research

Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3