Stenting or angioplasty for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Author:

Flumignan Ronald Luiz Gomes12ORCID,Civile Vinicius Tassoni2ORCID,Areias Libnah Leal1ORCID,Flumignan Carolina Dutra Queiroz23ORCID,Amorim Jorge Eduardo1ORCID,Lopes Renato Delascio4ORCID,Nakano Luis C. U.12ORCID,Baptista-Silva Jose Carlos Costa12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

2. Cochrane Brazil, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

3. Centro Universitário São Camilo, São Paulo, Brazil

4. Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.

Abstract

Background: Although the cornerstone treatment for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) remains anticoagulation, clinicians perform stenting or angioplasty (SA) in particular patients. To assess the effects of SA in this setting, we performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Methods: Based on the Cochrane standards, we searched the Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS and IBECS databases, and trial registries. Our primary outcomes were post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), venous thromboembolism (VTE) and all-cause mortality. Results: We included 7 randomized controlled trial (1485 participants). There was no clinically significant difference between SA and best medical practice (BMP) for the additional treatment of acute DVT regarding PTS (standardized mean difference −7.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] −12.13 to −3.61; very low-certainty) and VTE (risk ratio [RR] 1.19, 95% CI 0.28–5.07, very low-certainty), and no deaths. Compared to BMP, the SA plus BMP and thrombolysis results in little to no difference in PTS (mean difference [MD] −1.07, 95% CI −1.12 to −1.02, moderate-certainty), VTE (RR 1.48, 95% CI 0.95–2.31, low-certainty), and mortality (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.34–2.52, low-certainty). There was no clinical difference between stenting and BMP for chronic DVT regarding PTS (MD 2.73, 95% CI −2.10 to 7.56, very low certainty) and no VTE and death events. Conclusions: SA results in little to no difference in PTS, VTE and mortality in acute DVT compared to BMP. The evidence regarding SA in chronic DVT and whether SA, compared to BMP and thrombolysis, decreases PTS and VTE in acute DVT is uncertain. Open Science Framework (osf.io/f2dm6)

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference34 articles.

1. Clinical practice guidelines on the management of venous thrombosis.;Kakkos;Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg,2021

2. Anticoagulants for people hospitalised with COVID-19.;Flumignan;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2022

3. Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.;Di Nisio;Lancet,2016

4. Pharmacological interventions for preventing venous thromboembolism in people undergoing bariatric surgery.;Amaral;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2022

5. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: second update of the CHEST guideline and expert panel report.;Stevens;Chest,2021

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3