Does the variant positivity and negativity affect the clinical course in COVID-19?: A cohort study

Author:

Yildirim Erkan1ORCID,Kilickan Levent2,Aksoy Suleyman Hilmi34,Gozukucuk Ramazan56,Kilic Hasan Huseyin27,Tomak Yakup28,Dalkilic Orhan9,Tanboga Ibrahim Halil10,Kilickan Fevzi Duhan Berkan11

Affiliation:

1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hisar Intercontinental Hospital, Umraniye, Istanbul, Turkiye

2. Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Hisar Intercontinental Hospital, Umraniye, Istanbul, Turkiye

3. Department of Radiology, Hisar Intercontinental Hospital, Umraniye, Istanbul, Turkiye

4. Department of Medical Imaging Techniques, Istanbul Galata University, Beyoglu, Istanbul, Turkiye

5. Department of Infectious Diseases, Hisar Intercontinental Hospital, Umraniye, Istanbul, Turkiye

6. Faculty of Dentist, Istanbul Galata University, Beyoglu, Istanbul, Turkiye

7. Department of Anesthesiology, Dogus University, Istanbul, Turkiye

8. School of Health Sciences, Dogus University, Istanbul, Turkiye

9. Department of Chest Diseases, Hisar Intercontinental Hospital, Umraniye, Istanbul, Turkiye

10. Department of Cardiology, Nisantasi University, Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkiye

11. Dept. of Intensive Care Unit & Emergency, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkiye.

Abstract

The primary aim of the current study is to analyze the clinical, laboratory, and demographic data comparing the patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) admitted to our intensive care unit before and after the UK variant was first diagnosed in December 2020. The secondary objective was to describe a treatment approach for COVID-19. Between Mar 12, 2020, and Jun 22, 2021, 159 patients with COVID-19 were allocated into 2 groups: the variant negative group (77 patients before December 2020) and the variant positive group (82 patients after December 2020). The statistical analyses included early and late complications, demographic data, symptoms, comorbidities, intubation and mortality rates, and treatment options. Regarding early complications, unilateral pneumonia was more common in the variant (−) group (P = .019), whereas bilateral pneumonia was more common in the variant (+) group (P < .001). Regarding late complications, only cytomegalovirus pneumonia was observed more frequently in the variant (−) group (P = .023), whereas secondary gram (+) infection, pulmonary fibrosis (P = .048), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (P = .017), and septic shock (P = .051) were more common in the variant (+) group. The therapeutic approach showed significant differences in the second group such as plasma exchange and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation which is more commonly used in the variant (+) group. Although mortality and intubation rates did not differ between the groups, severe challenging early and late complications were observed mainly in the variant (+) group, necessitating invasive treatment options. We hope that our data from the pandemic will shed light on this field. Regarding the COVID-19 pandemic, it is clear that there is much to be done to deal with future pandemics.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3