The effects of whole-body muscle stimulation on body composition and strength parameters: A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Rodrigues-Santana Luiz1ORCID,Hugo Louro2,Pérez-Gómez Jorge3,Hernández-Mocholí Miguel A.1,Carlos-Vivas Jorge4,Saldaña-Cortés Pilar5,Contreras-Barraza Nicolás6,Adsuar José C.7

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Sport Science, University of Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain

2. Sport Sciences School of Rio Maior, Research Center in Sport Science, Health and Human Development, Vila Real, Portugal

3. Health, Economy, Motricity and Education (HEME), Faculty of Sport Science, University of Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain

4. Physical Activity for Education, Performance and Health (PAEPH), Faculty of Sport Science, University of Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain

5. Formación General, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Santiago, Chile

6. Facultad de Economía y Negocios, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile

7. Promoting a Healthy Society (PHeSo), Faculty of Sport Science, University of Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain.

Abstract

Background:This systematic review and meta-analysis set out to determine the efficacy of whole-body muscle electrostimulation on body composition, strength, and muscle power in active and non-active adults (aged ≥18 years).Method:This review was reported in accordance with the Protocol Statement of Preferred Reporting Element Guidelines for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis included controlled trials; whole-body electromyostimulation trials with at least 1 exercise and control group; participants >18 years old. Outcome measures were defined as standardized mean differences for muscle mass, body fat mass, strength, and power. Studies were searched in the following electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and EMBASE for all articles published up to July 30, 2021. The risk of bias was assessed by 2 independent researchers using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach. Analyses were performed using the metafor package of the statistical software R (version 4.0.3; R Core Team, 2020). Random effects models, forest, and funnel plots to quantify the asymmetry associated with publication bias were fitted using the metafor library in R. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed usingI2statistics.Results:In total, 26 studies representing 1183 participants were included (WB-electromyostimulation: n = 586 and control group: n = 597). The mean age of the participants ranged from a minimum of 20.4 to a maximum of 77.4 years old. Interventions lasted a minimum of 4 and a maximum of 54 weeks. Standardized mean difference was 0.36 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.16–0.57) for muscle mass,0.38 (95% CI: −0.62–0.15) for body fat, 0.54 (95% CI: 0.35–0.72) for strength, and 0.36 (95% CI: 0.02–0.71) for power with significant differences between groups (allP< .04).I2revealed low heterogeneity of muscle mass (15%) and power (0%) between trials and medium heterogeneity of body fat (45%) and strength (55%).Conclusion:We concluded that WB-electromyostimulation has significant positive effects on muscle mass, body fat, strength, and power.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference68 articles.

1. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise.;Garber;Med Sci Sports Exerc,2011

2. The effects of high-intensity interval training vs. moderate-intensity continuous training on body composition in overweight and obese adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.;Wewege;Obes Rev,2017

3. Body composition remodeling and mortality: the health aging and body composition study.;Santanasto;J Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci,2017

4. Influence of resistance exercise on lean body mass in aging adults: a meta-analysis.;Peterson;Med Sci Sports Exerc,2011

5. Effects of a concurrent physical exercise program on aerobic power and body composition in adults.;Michell;J Sports Med Phys Fitness,2014

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3