Evaluation of acute asthma management among emergency doctors using simulation-based assessment

Author:

Nagaretnam Bhasyani1,Md Jamal Shamsuriani2ORCID,Abu Bakar Afliza2,Zaini Ida Zarina2,Saiboon Ismail M.2

Affiliation:

1. Emergency and Trauma, Hospital Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia

2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz UKM, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Abstract

Assessment of asthma management competency using conventional methods remains challenging. This study aimed to explore the baseline knowledge, diagnosis accuracy and clinical management accuracy of acute asthma among emergency doctors using simulation-based assessment. We conducted a cross-sectional study involving 65 emergency department medical officers at a tertiary center. Participants were evaluated using 2 components: knowledge assessment of acute asthma and clinical performance assessment. Knowledge was evaluated using a standardized knowledge questionnaire. Clinical performance in managing acute asthma was assessed using a simulated acute asthma scenario and a standardized asthma management checklist using real-time assessments. The mean knowledge score was 14.69 ± 2.16. No significant differences were found in diagnosis and management accuracy in relation to knowledge (H = 0.644, P = .725, df = 6; H = 1.337, P = .512, df = 2). Acute-asthma attacks of all severities were poorly assessed, with accuracies of 27.3, 41.9, and 20.1% in mild, moderate, severe, and life-threatening cases, respectively. However, all participants provided high-quality treatment (accuracy = 82.3%) regardless of severity. Knowledge score does not influence the ability to differentiate asthma severity and management accuracy according to established asthma guidelines. The overall treatment accuracy was high, regardless of the severity of asthma. However, assessment of acute asthma requires further refinement.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference22 articles.

1. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.;Abbafati;Lancet,2020

2. The Third National Health and Morbidity Survey.;Suzana;Asia Pacific J Public Health,2012

3. Compliance with asthma guidelines and association with outcomes in the emergency department of a tertiary care teaching hospital.;Wong;J Acute Med,2018

4. Primary care clinician adherence with asthma guidelines: the National Asthma Survey of Physicians.;Akinbami;J Asthma,2020

5. Simulation-based assessments in health professional education: a systematic review.;Ryall;J Multidiscip Healthc,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3