Effect of ondansetron compared to lidocaine and placebo for reducing propofol injection pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Author:

Zaazouee Mohamed Sayed1,Mahmoud Abdelrahman Mohamed2,Elfar Waleed Hosny3,Hana Kerolous4,Shamshoon Kerollos F.4,Adly Michael H.4,Hussein Tarek A.4,Hamza Mohammad M.5,Aly Abrar Abdelhamid6,Eguzo Mohammed Ahmed6,Farhat Abdullah Mohamed7,Elsnhory Ahmed Bostamy3,Morsy Mohammed Hassan6,Ammar Manar Farag8,Alnaji Abdalrhman Abdalmajid9,Elshanbary Alaa Ahmed6,Shah Jaffer10ORCID,AbdelQadir Yossef Hassan6

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Assiut, Egypt

2. Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt

3. Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt

4. Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt

5. Faculty of Medicine, Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan

6. Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt

7. Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt

8. Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt

9. Faculty of Medicine, Fajr College for Science and Technology, Khartoum, Sudan

10. Kateb University, Medical Research Center, Kateb University, Kabul.

Abstract

Objective: Propofol is the most commonly used intravenous anesthetic medication and is most commonly associated with post-operative pain. Several drugs are investigated to reduce post-operative pain caused by propofol injection. Ondansetron is a potent anti-emetic drug showing promising results as an analgesic. This meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy of ondansetron to placebo and lidocaine in reducing post-operative pain caused by propofol injection. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) till May 2022. We conducted a meta-analysis using RevMan software version 5.4, and we assessed the quality of included RCTs using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Results: In our study, we included 23 RCTs with 2957 participants. Compared to placebo, ondansetron significantly increased the rate of no pain [risk ratio (RR) = 2.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.39–4.01)], and reduced moderate [RR = 0.39, 95% CI (0.30–0.52)] and severe pain [RR = 0.34, 95% CI (0.24–0.50)]. Furthermore, ondansetron significantly reduced PONV [RR = 0.73, 95% CI (0.58, 0.91)]. On the other hand, ondansetron showed an inferior efficacy to lidocaine regarding the incidence of no, moderate, and severe pain. Conclusion: Ondansetron is effective in reducing post-operative propofol-induced pain. However, lidocaine is more effective than it.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference45 articles.

1. Prevention of pain on injection with propofol: a quantitative systematic review.;Picard;Anesth Analg,2000

2. Hyoscine N-butylbromide for preventing propofol injection pain: a randomized, placebo-controlled and double-blind study.;Sargin;Med Princ Pract,2018

3. Pain on injection of propofol.;Tan;Anaesthesia,1998

4. Which clinical anesthesia outcomes are both common and important to avoid? the perspective of a panel of expert anesthesiologists.;Macario;Anesth Analg,1999

5. Assessment and modification of pain on induction with propofol (Diprivan).;McCulloch;Anaesthesia,1985

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3