Hypertonic glucose in the treatment of low back pain: A randomized clinical trial

Author:

Pereira Pires Jose Alberto1ORCID,Rey Moura Ed Carlos2,Oliveira Caio Marcio Barros de2,Vieira Dibai-Filho Almir3,Soares Brandão Nascimento Maria do Desterro4,da Cunha Leal Plinio2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neuro-Orthopedics, University Hospital of the Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil

2. Department of Medicine I, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil

3. Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil

4. Department of Pathology, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.

Abstract

Background: Chronic low back pain (LBP) is defined as pain lasting longer than 3 months and is one of the conditions with the most significant social impact. Treatment is complex and includes proliferative agents used in prolotherapy. The mechanism is not known, but osmotic agents (hypertonic solutions of dextrose or glucose) cause cellular rupture and an inflammatory response that releases cytokines and growth factors that lead to scarring and reinnervation. Methods: Patients with chronic LBP (>12 weeks) who were non-traumatic and unresponsive to at least 1 month of physical therapy were selected. All patients were followed up at a return visit at 1, 3, and 6 months for pain assessment using validated pain questionnaires and scales. Results: Nineteen patients were included in the conservative group and 19 in the glucose group, with the majority being women (57.9%). The patients were between 47 and 59 years of age (39.5%), mixed race (76.33%), married or in a committed relationship (73.7%), and had completed the study for 5.2 years. Overall mean body mass index was 27.3 ± 4.4 kg/m2 and was higher in the conservative group (28.0 ± 4.7 kg/m2). The groups showed differences in Visual Analog Scale scores, with median and amplitude values close to each other between the time points evaluated and increasing values in the glucose group, which had significantly higher values for this scale at the third evaluation (P = .031). When comparing the Rolland-Morris scale scores between the groups, there was a significant difference only in the 3-m assessment (P = .021). In the follow-up assessment, both groups showed significant improvement between T0 and the other assessment time points (P < .05) in all evaluations. Conclusion: Both groups significantly improved on the evaluated scales during follow-up. Overall, no effects were attributable to the glucose components or the prolotherapy protocol.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3