Nafamostat mesilate for prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on prospective, randomized, and controlled trials

Author:

Xie Yu1,Cheng Ziyao2,Deng Cunliang1,Deng Mingming2,Zhang Hailong2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Infectious Diseases, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China

2. Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of nafamostat mesilate in the prevention of post–endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) by conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis. Method: We retrieved for all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about compare nafamostat mesilate with placebo in preventing PEP published before August 23, 2022, in 5 major electronic databases. The primary outcome was PEP rate, and the secondary outcome was post-ERCP hyperamylasemia (PEHA) rate. Subgroup analyses were performed to reveal the factors that may affect the preventive effect of nafamostat. Assessment of the quality of evidence was conducted based on Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) system. Results: According to the search strategy and criteria of inclusion and exclusion, 8 articles with a number of 3210 patients were included. The PEP incidence of the nafamostat group was inferior compared with the placebo group (4.6% vs 8.5%, RR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.38–0.66). Subgroup analyses revealed that nafamostat had a preventive effect on patients with different risk stratification (High-risk: RR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.43–0.86, Low-risk: RR = 0.28; 95% CI: 0.17–0.47). Different doses (20 mg: RR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.36–0.69, 50 mg: RR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.27–0.74) and duration (<12 hour: RR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.37–0.81, ≥12 h: RR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.29–0.66) of administration of nafamostat are adequate for the prevention of PEP, but postoperative administration may not help (preoperative: RR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.39–0.69, postoperative: RR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.23–1.23). Nafamostat may not efficacious in preventing severe PEP (Mild: RR = 0.49, 95% CI, 0.35–0.68, Moderate: RR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.25–0.86, Severe: RR = 0.91, 95% CI, 0.25–3.29) or in low-quality studies (Low-quality: RR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.13–3.60, High-quality: RR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.37–0.65). Conclusion: Preoperative use of nafamostat can effectively prevent PEP in patients with various risk stratification. Nafamostat can prevent mild and moderate PEP, but may not prevent severe PEP and PEHA. There should be more high-quality RCTs in future to strengthen the evidence of nafamostat in preventing PEP.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3