Navigation makes more accurate femur resection compared to conventional total knee arthroplasty in lateral femoral bowing greater than 5º

Author:

Nam Jun Ho1,Jung Suk Han1,Bae Jin Woo2,Bae Dong Jin2,Choi Won Kee2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Gumi CHA University Medical Center, Gumi, Korea

2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Daegu Catholic University, Daegu, Korea.

Abstract

There are many disagreements about the merits of navigation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We compared and analyzed the difference in the accuracy of femoral resection according to the degree of lateral femoral bowing in 2 surgical methods (conventional and navigation-assisted TKA). A total of 238 (100 who underwent navigation TKA and 138 who underwent conventional TKA from 2016 to 2021) were included in this study. The surgeon first performed TKA as the main operator in 2016. Most of the TKAs were navigation-assisted between 2016 and 2018, and most of the TKAs were conventional between 2019 and 2021. For more accurate distal femoral cutting in patients with lateral femoral bowing, a preoperative scanogram was used to set up the insertion point of the IM rod in conventional TKA. Femoral lateral bowing was divided into 3 groups based on the angle. Group 1 was divided into groups with negative values, group 2 into mild bowing of 0° to 5°, and group 3 into groups with moderate bowing of ≥ 5°. The postoperative mechanical hip knee ankle angle and mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) were aimed to be 0° and 90°. The allowable ranges of these values were set as 0° ± 3° and 90° ± 3°, respectively. The distribution of outliers of the mLDFA in the 3 groups divided according to lateral femoral bowing in the navigation-assisted group was not statistically significant difference (P = .59). On the other hand, the distribution of outliers of mLDFA was statistically significant difference in the conventional method group (P = .01). The odds ratio of the outlier occurrence of mLDFA in the conventional method was 2.50, which was statistically significant (P = .03). Also, when the lateral femoral bowing value was moderate; i.e., ≥5°, the odds ratio was 4.20, which was statistically significant (P = .003). In the case of navigation-assisted TKA, the accuracy of femur resection was consistent regardless of the degree of lateral femoral bowing. However, in conventional TKA, the outlier of femur resection increased as lateral femoral bowing increased. Especially, for patients with lateral femoral bowing >5°, navigation-assisted TKA allows for more accurate femur resection compared to conventional TKA.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3