Comparison of different interventions for the reduction of labor pain: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Author:

Yu Mengxian1,Qian Haiyan1,Gan Miao1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Anesthesiology Department, Chongqing KangHuaZhongLian Cardiovascular Hospital, Chongqing, China.

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review and network meta-analysis were performed to compare different interventions for the reduction of labor pain. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and ScienceDirect databases were searched for the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) meeting prespecified inclusion criteria up to January, 2023. Interventions including electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS), epidural analgesia (EA) and control treatments. The primary outcomes included pain scores, failure rate of natural delivery, adverse events and Apgar scores. The methodological quality was assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Meta-analysis was performed by R software with gemtc package. Surfaces under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) were used to rank the intervention. Results: Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the network meta-analysis. TEAS (WMD −3.1, 95% CrI −3.8, −2.5) and EA (WMD −2.1, 95% CrI −2.8, −1.3) was more effective than the control in decreasing VAS. TEAS ranked first (SUCRA, 90.9%), EA ranked second (SUCRA, 74.0%) and control ranked last (SUCRA, 35.0%) for reducing VAS. For patients with labor pain, with respect to the most effective treatment for reducing failure rate of natural delivery, TEAS ranked first (SUCRA, 96.6%), EA ranked second (SUCRA, 50.4%) and control ranked last (SUCRA, 3.0%). With regard to the Apgar scores, there was high probability that TEAS ranked first (SUCRA, 80.7%), compared to control (SUCRA, 41.4%) and EA (SUCRA 27.9%). With regard to the adverse events, there was high probability that TEAS ranked first (SUCRA, 99.9%), compared to control (SUCRA, 33.2%) and EA (SUCRA 17.6%). Conclusion: TEAS has the potential to serve as a viable alternative for women in labor, offering a simple, noninvasive, and non-pharmacological intervention that surpasses EA in terms of both analgesic effectiveness and safety for both mothers and neonates.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference36 articles.

1. The effect of prenatal education on fear of childbirth, pain intensity during labour and childbirth experience: a scoping review using systematic approach and meta-analysis.;Alizadeh-Dibazari;BMC Pregnancy Childbirth,2023

2. The effectiveness of aromatherapy in the management of labor pain and anxiety: a systematic review.;Tabatabaeichehr;Ethiop J Health Sci,2020

3. Music therapy in pain and anxiety management during labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis.;Santiváñez-Acosta;Medicina (Kaunas),2020

4. Pain management during labor and vaginal birth.;Nanji;Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol,2020

5. Nitrous oxide for the management of labor pain: a systematic review.;Likis;Anesth Analg,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3