Outcomes of the Modified Dunn Procedure Versus Delayed Imhauser Osteotomy for Moderate to Severe Stable Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis

Abstract

Background: Traditional management of moderate to severe stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) has been in situ fixation followed by reconstructive surgery if symptoms arise. This delayed approach may lead to irreversible intra-articular damage of the hip over time. The purpose of this study was to compare radiographic and clinical outcomes of the modified Dunn procedure (MDP) versus in situ fixation followed by delayed Imhauser osteotomy (DIO). Methods: This was a retrospective study from a single institution between 2001 and 2021. Among 250 patients diagnosed with SCFE, a total of 18 (18 hips) treated with MDP and 16 (18 hips) treated with DIO for moderate to severe stable SCFE were included. Most patients who underwent DIO either had concomitant (11/18 hips) or subsequent (2/18 hips) open osteochondroplasty. Mean follow up was 4.7 years (range: 1 to 12.8 y). Radiographs were reviewed to measure Southwick angle, anteroposterior and lateral alpha (α) angles, and femoral head-neck offset ratio preoperatively and at latest follow up. Charts were reviewed for demographics, subsequent surgeries, complications, and Heyman-Herndon clinical outcomes. Results: The amount of deformity correction was greater in the MDP than DIO group based on anteroposterior α angles (mean: 22.3 vs. 11.9 degrees, P=0.046) and femoral head-neck offset ratios (mean: 0.26 vs. 0.12, P=0.001). There was no significant difference in Heyman-Herndon scores (both 16/18, 88.9% good to excellent outcomes, P>0.999). Less reoperations were performed in the MDP than DIO group (2/18, 11.1% vs. 9/18, 50%; P=0.004). AVN occurred in 2/18 hips (11.1%) in the MDP group with both surgeries performed early in the series and underwent prior in situ screw fixation compared with 0/18 hips (0%) in the DIO group (P=0.486). One patient in the DIO group was later diagnosed with osteoarthritis. Conclusions: MDP resulted in more anatomic coronal and sagittal plane deformity correction, less reoperations, and similar Heyman-Herndon clinical outcomes compared with DIO. AVN occurred in the MDP group whereas osteoarthritis occurred in the DIO group. These complications must be weighed against improved long-term clinical results for patients who would otherwise be at risk for premature degenerative joint disease due to residual proximal femoral deformity. Level of Evidence: Level III—retrospective comparative study.